期刊文献+

中国传统文化何以容纳患者自主 被引量:1

Compatibility of Traditional Chinese Culture and Patient's Autonomy
原文传递
导出
摘要 患者自主概念源于生命伦理学的自主原则,它在概念上强调对医患关系的依附和医生对患者自主权利的尊重。传统儒家的仁学在强调人与人之间的关系的同时,没有否定个人的自主,通过对"人"的肯定和对人的"情感自由"的认可来体现自主的力量。传统中国医患关系中,要求医生尊重生命、尊重患者,治病时要了解患者的心理和情感等,表明了中国传统文化能够容纳患者自主。 Patients’autonomy derives from the principle of autonomy in bioethics,which emphasizes the doctor’s obligations to respect and protect the rights of the patient.Confucianism places greater emphasis on the relationship between human beings,and on the other hand,it does not ignore autonomy of an individual,which shows the autonomous power of an individual through the affirmation of‘humans’and“emotional freedom”of hu-mans.According to the traditional ideas about doctor -patient relationship,doctors should give priority to pa-tients’life,respect them,be polite to them,and understand their psychology and emotions during treatment,and so on.This shows traditional doctor -patient relationship can be compatible with the patients’autonomy.
作者 庄晓平
出处 《昆明理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 2015年第3期7-10,100,共5页 Journal of Kunming University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences)
基金 教育部人文社会科学基金项目"基于患者自主权的医患关系研究"(11YJC720065)
关键词 中国传统文化 儒家 患者自主 道德主体 医患关系 traditional Chinese culture Confucianism patients ' autonomy moral subject doctor-patient relationship
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1ROBERTJLEVINE.Informedconsent:somechallengestotheuniversalvalidityofthewesternmodel[J].law,MedicineandHealthCare,1991,19:207-213.
  • 2DWORKIN,GERALD.TheTheoryandPracticeofAu-tonomy[M].NewYork:GmrbridgeUniversityPress,1988:34.
  • 3TOM LBEAUCHAMP,JAMESFCHILDRESS.ThePrinciplesofBiomedicalEthics[M].5thed.NewYork:OxfordUniversityPress,2000:123.
  • 4ONORAO’ NEILL.AutonomyandTrustinBioethics[M].CambridgeUniversityPress,2001:87.
  • 5庄晓平.西方生命伦理学自主原则“自主”之涵义辨析——从比彻姆、德沃金和奥尼尔的观点看[J].哲学研究,2014(2):93-98. 被引量:8
  • 6杜维明.儒家思想新论-创造性转换的自我[M].南京:江苏人民出版社,1996:76.
  • 7本杰明·史华兹.古代中国的思想世界[M].南京:江苏人民出版社,2004.221.
  • 8赫伯特·芬格莱特.孔子-即凡而圣[M].南京:江苏人民出版社,2002:6-7.
  • 9李泽厚.中国古代思想史论:第1册[M].合肥:安徽文艺出版社,1994:25.
  • 10杜维明.道、学、政--论儒家知识分子[M].钱文忠, 盛勤, 译.土海: 上海人民出版社,2000:12.

二级参考文献9

  • 1密尔.2010年,《论自由》,许宝骥译,商务印书馆.
  • 2Beauchamp, 2005, "Who Deserves Autonomy, and Whose Autonomy Deserves Respect?" in ed. by Talor, Personal Autonomy: New Essays on Personal Autonomy and Its Role in Contemporary Moral Philosophy, New York: Gmrbridge University Press.
  • 3Beauchamp and Childress, 2000 , The Principles of BiomedicalEthics, (5h ed) , New York: Oxford University Press.
  • 4Darwall, 1998, Philosophical Ethics, Colorado: Westview Press.
  • 51)workin, 1988, The Theory and Practice of Autorwmy, New York: Gmrbridge University Press.
  • 6Levine, 1991, "Informed consent: some challenges to the universal validity of the western model," in Medicine and Health Care (19).
  • 7O'Neill, 2001, Autonomy and Trust in Bioethics [ M] , Cambridge University Press.
  • 8Thomas , 2005, "The Concept of Autonomy in Bioethics: An Unwarranted Fall from Grace", in ed. by Talor, Personal Autonomy: New Essays on Personal Autonomy and Its Role in Contemporary Moral Philosophy, New York : Gmrbridge University Press.
  • 9邱仁宗.21世纪生命伦理学展望[J].哲学研究,2000(1):31-34. 被引量:50

共引文献39

同被引文献32

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部