期刊文献+

冤案的呼唤:法律人需加强逻辑素养

The Voice of Injustice: Law Practitioners Need to Strengthen The Logic Literacy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 古今中外都有冤案发生,近年来由于几大冤案在我国接连出现,冤案问题已引起社会广泛关注.冤案的酿成有着复杂的因素,其中也有逻辑意识的淡薄、逻辑规律的违背、逻辑规则的违反和逻辑论证的不足等逻辑因素.法律人应具备相应的逻辑素养,在逻辑意识和逻辑思维中执法,以有效避免冤假错案的发生.培养逻辑素养需要学点逻辑知识,锻炼逻辑能力,运用逻辑艺术. There have been injustices in ancient and modern time, in China and foreign countries. Due tothe emergence of several major injustices in our country during recent years, this issue has been aroused widespreadconcern. The factors, such as the weakness of the logic sense, the deviation of the logic discipline, theviolation of the logic rules and the sufficience of the logic proof and so on, are complicated. In order to avoidoccuring the injustice, the law practitioners should possess the appropriate logic literacy and enforce the law withlogic sense and thinking. They should be required to learn the logical knowledge, train the logical ability and exertlogical art to develop logic literacy.
作者 王仁法
出处 《广东培正学院学报》 2015年第2期60-63,78,共5页 Journal of Guangdong Peizheng College
关键词 冤案 法律人 逻辑素养 injustice law practitioners logic literacy
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1考夫曼 郑永流译.当代法哲学和法律理论导论[M].北京:法律出版社,2002,4..
  • 2熊明辉.论法律逻辑中的推论规则[J].中国社会科学,2008(4):26-35. 被引量:30
  • 3卡多佐.司法过程的性质[M].北京:商务印书馆,1998.
  • 4博登海默.法理学-法哲学及其方法[M].北京:华夏出版社,1987.198,199.
  • 5柴学友. 检察官的逻辑思维[M]. 北京:中国法制出版社,2010.
  • 6王仁法. 让逻辑艺术走进法治社会[M]. 北京: 中国法制出版社,2010.
  • 7中共中央宣传部.习近平总书记系列重要讲话读本[M].北京:学习出版社、人民出版社,2014:26.
  • 8孙笑侠. 法治思维的基本要领[N]. 北京日报,2014-12-08.

二级参考文献38

  • 1Wilson Huhn, The Five Types of Legal Argument, Durham: Carolina Academic Press, 2002.
  • 2James A. Gardner, Legal Argument: The Structure and Language of Effective Advocacy, 2^nd Edition, Newark, NJ: LexisNexis Matthew Bender, 2007.
  • 3Kevin D. Ashley, Modeling Legal Arguments: Reasoning with Cases and Hypotheticals, Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1991.
  • 4Henry Prakken, Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument, Dordrecht/Boston/Lodon: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1997.
  • 5Douglas Walton, Legal Argumentation and Evidence, University Park : Pennsylvania State University Press, 2002.
  • 6Aulis Aarnio, The Rational as Reasonable: A Treatise on Legal Justification, Dordrecht/Boston/ Lancaster/Tokyo: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1987.
  • 7Arno R. Lodder, DiaLaw: On Legal Justification and Dialogical Models of Argumentation. Dordrecht/ Boston/Lodon: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999.
  • 8Aleksander Peczenik, The Basis of Legal Justification, Lund: Lund University Press, 1983.
  • 9Charles R. Calleros, Legal Method and Legal Writing, 6^th Edition, New York: Aspen Publishers, 2006.
  • 10Joseph Horovitz, Law and Logic: A Critical Account of Legal Argument, pp. 18-19, 77-78.

共引文献521

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部