摘要
目的:评估家庭漂白疗效及安全性。方法:对CBM、CNKI、MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane Library进行检索,纳入所有对外源性着色牙进行家庭漂白的随机对照试验。按纳入标准筛选,用Cochrane系评价文献质量、用固定效应模型进行Meta分析。结果:最终纳入文献12篇,包括患者611例。分析结果显示10%过氧化脲(CP)漂白效果优于15%CP(MD,0.21;CI:[0.03,0.38];Z=1.92;P=0.002),35%过氧化氢(HP)诊室漂白导致的短期牙敏感强度明显强于10%CP家庭漂白(MD,-1.68;95%CI:[-2.75,-0.61];Z=3.09;P=0.002),38%HP诊室漂白结论相同(MD,-2.64;95%CI:[-3.96,-1.32];Z=3.93;P<0.000 1)。但HP、CP家庭漂白的牙敏感无统计学差异(OR,1.94;95%CI:[0.84,4.44];Z=1.56;P=0.12)。结论:低浓度CP家庭漂白效果优于高浓度CP,诊室漂白较家庭漂白更易导致牙敏感。
Objective:To evaluate the efficiency and safty of home-bleaching.Methods:Randomised controlled trials on home-bleaching were searched using CBM,CNKI,Medline,EMBASE and Cochrane Library up to April,201 3.The articles were selected by inclusion criterion,qualified by Cochrane system and analysed by Meta method.Results:1 2 studies with 61 1 cases were finally includ-ed and analysed.The results showed that 1 0% carbamide peroxide (CP)produced better bleaching efficiency than 1 5% CP(MD, 0.21 ;CI:[0.03,0.38];Z =1 .92;P =0.002).Hydrogen peroxide(HP)at 35% lead to higher tooth sensitivity in office-bleaching than CP at 1 0% in home-bleaching(MD,-1 .68;95%CI:[-2.75,-0.61 ];Z =3.09;P =0.002);home-bleaching were asso-ciated with less tooth sensitivity than office-bleaching(MD,-2.64;95%CI:[-3.96,-1 .32];Z =3.93;P〈0.000 1 ),while there was no significance of tooth sensitivity between home-bleaching using CP and HP (OR,1 .94;95%CI:[0.84,4.44];Z =1 .56;P =0.1 2).Conclusion:1 0% CP home-bleaching may produce better bleaching efficiency;home-bleaching is associated with less tooth sensitivity than office-bleaching.
出处
《实用口腔医学杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2015年第3期384-388,共5页
Journal of Practical Stomatology
关键词
家庭漂白
美学
牙敏感
系统评价
META-分析
Home-bleaching
Esthetics
Tooth sensitivity
Systematic review
Meta-analysis