期刊文献+

双层高架桥门式墩与独柱墩抗震性能比较分析 被引量:1

Comparison and Analysis on Seismic Performance of Portal Pier and Single-column Pier of Double-layer Elevated Bridge
下载PDF
导出
摘要 上层市政道路下层轨道交通的双层高架桥已越来越广泛地运用于城市交通中,但是由于其结构的复杂性,地震震害表现出与一般高架桥不同的特点,需要对其抗震性能进行深入研究。基于国内某工程实例,比较分析了门式墩与独柱墩双层高架桥的抗震性能,包括计算模型的建立、动力特性分析、反应谱分析及非线性时程分析,得出了若干结论,可为今后类似工程抗震设计提供借鉴。 The double-layer elevated bridge of municipal road at upper layer and rail traffic at lower layer has been more and more widely applied for the urban traffic. Owing to its structural complexity, the seismic damage has the characteristic different from the general elevated bridges. It is required to study its seismic performance. Based on an engineering case of China, the article compares and analyzes the seismic performances of the portal pier and single-column pier double-layer elevated bridges including the establishment of calculation model, analysis of dynamic characteristic, analysis of response spectrum and analysis of nonlinear time history. The several given conclusions can be referred for the seismic design of the similar projects in the future.
作者 鲁传安
出处 《城市道桥与防洪》 2015年第5期88-91,13,共4页 Urban Roads Bridges & Flood Control
关键词 双层高架桥 动力特性 地震反应 抗震性能 double-layer elevated bridge,dynamic characteristic,seismic response,seismic performance
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献11

  • 1彭天波,李建中,胡世德,范立础.双层高架桥的抗震性能[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2004,32(10):1355-1359. 被引量:26
  • 2彭天波,李建中,胡世德,范立础.上海市共和新路双层高架桥的抗震试验研究[J].结构工程师,2005,21(3):39-43. 被引量:5
  • 3Zayati F,Mahin S A.Experimental and analytical evaluation of a retrofit double-deck viaduct structure[R].Berkeley:University of California,1996.
  • 4CALTRANS,Caltrans Seismic Design Criteria,Version1.3[M].California Department of Transportation,Sacramento,USA.2004.
  • 5Priestley M J N,Seible F,Calvi G M.Seismic design and retrofit of bridges[M].New York:John Wiley and Sons,1996.
  • 6Peter Head. The Fourth Dimension[J]. Bridge Designgn & Engineering,Issue No. 1, October 1995:33-36.
  • 7Mike kennedy. Bridge Highlights[J]. Bridge Design & Engineering,Issue No. 8, August 1997:34-37.
  • 8Kund Nielsen. Sound Investment[J]. Bridge Design & Engineering,Issue No. 4, August 1996:46-51.
  • 9Priestley M J N, Seible F. Proof test of a retrofit concept for the San Francisco double-deck viaducts: part 1-design concept, details, and model [ J ]. ACI Structural Journal, 1995, (5) : 616-631.
  • 10Priestley M J N, Seible F. Proof test of a retrofit concept for the San Francisco double-deck viaducts: part 2- test details and resuhs [ J ]. ACI Structural Journal, 1993, (6): 513-524.

共引文献46

同被引文献3

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部