期刊文献+

美国产品责任法律适用新趋势研究——兼论我国法律适用法45条之修订

The New Tendency of Law Application for the Products Liability Tort Law in Recent America- With Some Comment on the Revision of the 45th Clause of the Applicable Law of Our Country
下载PDF
导出
摘要 美国晚近的产品责任侵权法律适用具有如下趋势:在司法实务界,侵权行为的准据法确定方法仍然因州而异,美国至今仍未形成全国性的统一规则,但第二次冲突法重述正获得越来越多的州的支持。另一方面,由于有关利益解释标准不一及难以应对真实的冲突及利益欠缺等问题,第二次冲突法重述愈发遭受学界猛烈的批判。近来,原先的"保护被害人利益"及"法院地法主义"等倾向逐渐淡化,代之以"重视连接点的积聚""防止选择法院"等倾向开始散见于各州的判例中。 The newly -passed Law Application for the Products Liability tort law in America has the following tendencies: the method to determine the applicable law for torts still varies from state to state in the judicial practice; a unified rule has not formed nationwide, but the Second Restatement of Conflict of Laws is gaining more and more support from the states. On the oth- er hand, due to different standards and difficulty to deal with the situations such as "real conflicts" and "lack of benefits", the Second Restatement of Conflict of Laws has been suffering fierce criticism from academics. In addition, the original tendencies such as "pro - victims" and "lexi fori - doctrine" is fading gradually, and they are being replaced by such trends as "to empha- size the connection point accumulation", "to prevent the choice of court", which begin to be seen in the cases of several states.
作者 殷骏
出处 《学术探索》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第6期83-88,共6页 Academic Exploration
基金 2013年上海市浦江人才计划项目(2013PJC067) 2012年上海高校青年教师培养资助计划项目"跨境侵权行为法律适用研究" 2011年国家社科基金一般项目(11BFX142) 2013年上海海事大学基金项目"全球化视野下特殊跨境侵权行为法律适用问题研究"
关键词 产品责任 法律适用 侵权法 product liability law application torts law
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 137 Scoles et al, supra note (2), P. 825.
  • 2See, B. Currie, Supra note. 12. P. 189.
  • 3Stoles et al, supra note (2) , PP. 824 826.
  • 4殷骏.巴克斯塔“比较损失”原则的方法论及判例法研究[J].河北法学,2013,31(4):128-133. 被引量:2
  • 5See, Neumeier v. Kuehner, 31 N. Y. 2d 121, 286 N. E. 2d454, 335 N. Y. S. 2d64 (N. Y. 1972).
  • 6Scoles et al, supra note (2), P. 689.
  • 7Leflar, Con- flicts of Law : More on Choice - Influencing Considerations [ J ]. California Law Review,54 ( 1966 ) : 1584.
  • 8B. Currie, Selected Essays on The Conflict of Laws. [ M ]. Duke University Press( 1963 ) (reprinted 1990) 1.
  • 9Babcock v. Jackson, 12 N. Y. 2d 473, 240 N. Y. S. 2d 743,749, 191 N. E. 2d 279 (1963).
  • 10See, Restatement (Second) , See. 145, comment e.

二级参考文献13

  • 1E.F. Scoles & P. Hay, Conflict of Laws § 2.4,12(2nd ed. 1992).
  • 2J. Story, Commentaries on the Conflict of Laws, Foreign and Domestic § 7.
  • 3J. H. Beale, Cases on the Conflicts of Laws, 517( 1901 ).
  • 4B. Currie, Selected Essays on The Conflict of Laws( Duke University Press,1963) (reprinted 1990).
  • 5Cook, The Logical and Legal Bases of the Conflict of Laws ( 1924 ). 33 YALE. L. J.
  • 6Baxter,Choice of Law and the Federal System,16 Stan. L. Rev. 1 (1963).
  • 7R. Leflar, L. McDougal Ill & R. Felix,American Conflicts Law 95 (4'h ed. 1986) ; R. Leflar, L.
  • 8David E. Cavers,A Critique of the Choice Of Law Problem,47 Harv . L. Rev . (1933) ;.
  • 9David E. Cavers, The Choice of Law : Selected Essays, 1933 - 1983, 3 - 36 ( University of Michigan. Law School, 1985 ).
  • 10Currie, The Disinterested Third State, 28 Law & Contemp. Probs. 754 (1963).

共引文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部