期刊文献+

从对陶谢评价的轩轾看王夫之的诗学观念

A Review of Wang Fuzhi's Poetic Perspective from His Valuation of Tao and Xie's Positions
原文传递
导出
摘要 在诗学史上,魏晋南北朝时期的两位大诗人陶渊明和谢灵运一直以陶谢并称,而且是陶在谢前、重陶而轻谢的。但清初大思想家、文学家王夫之在其《古诗评选》中对陶诗和谢诗的评价则不同,扬谢而抑陶是其主要倾向。本文通过王夫之对陶谢的评价,透视其诗学批评的主要取向,王夫之论诗重现量、神理和势,都在对陶谢的评价中得到了具体体现。 In the poetic history of Chinese literature, Tao Yuanming and Xie Lingyun, two great poets of the Six Dynasties, are always mentioned together. Although most of the literary criticism placed Tao ahead of Xie, Wang Fuzhi, an influential philosopher of the early Qing period, hold a different point of view in his Gushi pingxuan ( critical selection of ancient poetry) and praised Xie over Tao. Wang invited the Buddhist idea "pratysa" into his poetic criticism, thought crystal images could only be created with pratysa, and that existed in Xie's poetry. He took "shenli" as ideal presentation; he had a negative opinion for "li" appearing in poem in the way of logic. "Shi" is the tension and direction of a poem ; Wang emphasized "shi" in poetry. This paper is to explore the poetic ideas of Wang through the close reading of his criticism on the poetry of Tao and Xie, and furthermore makes a thorough discussion on the key terms of pratysa, shenli, and shi, which are essential in Wang's poetic system.
作者 张晶 张佳音
出处 《复旦学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第3期56-62,共7页 Fudan Journal(Social Sciences)
关键词 陶渊明 谢灵运 王夫之 《古诗评选》 诗学观念 Tao Yuanming Xie Lingyun Wang Fuzhi Gushi pingxuan poetics
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1苏轼:《与子由六首》,《苏轼佚文汇编》卷四,见孔凡礼编:《苏轼文集》第六册,北京:中华书局,1986年,第2515页.
  • 2叶梦得:《石林诗话》卷中,见何文焕辑《历代诗话》,北京:中华书局,1981年,第426页.
  • 3王夫之:《相宗络索》,见石峻等编:《中国佛教思想资料选编》第3卷第3册,北京:中华书局,1989年,第380页.
  • 4严羽:《沧浪诗话·诗辨》,见郭绍虞:《沧浪诗话校释》,北京:人民文学出版社,1961年,第26页.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部