期刊文献+

口服补液盐治疗儿童急性腹泻轻中度脱水的疗效研究 被引量:4

Efficacy of Rehydration Salts for Children with Acute Diarrhea in Different Dehydration
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:观察口服补液盐治疗儿童急性腹泻轻中度脱水的临床疗效。方法:选取我院儿科收治的63例急性腹泻伴轻中度脱水症状患儿,采取随机数表法分为两组,其中对照组32例患儿予标准口服补液盐,而治疗组31例患儿予补液盐溶液。对比治疗前后两组患儿血浆内Na+、K+、Cl-离子水平,临床症状恢复时间及改善情况。结果:治疗后,两组患儿的电解质水平均有所改善,治疗组患儿Na+、K+及Cl-水平均优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);治疗组患儿口渴、头晕、乏力及腹痛症状的恢复时间均较对照组明显缩短,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗组临床总有效率明显优于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:口服补液盐能明显改善儿童急性腹泻而致的轻中度脱水症状,减少静脉输液对患儿造成的负面影响,值得在临床上进行推广。 Objective: To observe the clinical efficacy of oral rehydration salts for children with acute diarrhea from mild to moderate dehydration. Methods: 63 cases of children with acute diarrhea from mild to moderate dehydration were selected and randomly divided into two groups. 32 cases in the control group were treated with standard oral rehydration salts(international standard formula),while 31 cases in the treatment group were treated with the rehydration salts solution. The plasma Na^+, K^+and Cl^-levels and clinical efficacy were observed and compared before and after the treatment between the two groups. Results: After treatment, the electrolyte levels were improved in both groups, and the Na^+, K^+and Cl^-in the treatment group were significantly higher than those of the control group with statistically significant differences(P〈0.05); the total effective rate of the treatment group was 96.77%, which was significantly higher than that of the control group(84.38%, P〈0.05). Conclusions: Oral rehydration salts could significantly improve the symptoms of dehydration for children with acute diarrhea from mild to moderate and had clinical significance of promotion.
出处 《现代生物医学进展》 CAS 2015年第18期3523-3525,3425,共4页 Progress in Modern Biomedicine
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目(90709018)
关键词 儿童急性腹泻 轻中度脱水 口服补液盐溶液 临床观察 Acute diarrhea Mild to moderate dehydration Oral rehydration salt solution Clinical observation
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献12

  • 1中国腹泻病诊断治疗方案[J].临床儿科杂志,1994,12(3):148-151. 被引量:459
  • 2Holliday M. The evolution of therapy for dehydration: should deficit therapy still be taught? Pediatrics, 1996, 98 : 171-177.
  • 3Gavin N, Merrik N, Davidson B. Efficacy of glucose-based oral rehydration therapy. Pediatrics, 1996, 98:45-51.
  • 4Finberg L. The role of oral electrolyte-glucose solutions in hydration for children-international and domestic aspects. J Pediatr, 1980, 96:51-54.
  • 5Rautanen T, El-Radhi S, Vesikari T. Clinical experience with a hypotonic oral rehydration solution in acute diarrhoea. Acta Paediatr, 1993, 82:52-54.
  • 6Mahalanabis D, Faruque AS, Hoque SS, et al. Hypotonic oral rehydration solution in acute diarrhoea: a controlled clinical trial.Acta Paediat, 1995, 84:289-293.
  • 7Rautanen T, Kurki S, Vesikari T. Randomized double blind study of hypotonic oral rehydration solution in diarrhea. Arch Dis Child,1997, 76: 272-274.
  • 8Choice Study Group. Multicentre, randomized, double blind clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a reduced osmolarity oral rehydration salts solution in children with acute watery diarrhoea. Pediatrics, 2001, 107: 613-618.
  • 9Santosham M, Fayad I, Abu Zikri M, et al. Double-blind clinical trial eomparing WHO-ORS with a redueed osmolarity solution eontaining equal amounts of sodium and glueose. J Pediatr, 996,128:45-51.
  • 10King CK, Glass R, Bresee JS, et al. Managing acute gastroenteritis among children : Oral rehydration, maintenance,and nutritional therapy. MMWR Recomm Rep, 2003, 52(16) :1-16.

共引文献12

同被引文献33

引证文献4

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部