摘要
文章的第一部分批判性地重估美国20世纪80年代出版的有关中国社会主义和妇女解放的极具影响的学术著作,揭示其冷战和自由/本质女性主义立场。通过集中分析朱迪思·斯泰西的《中国的父权与社会主义革命》,文章质疑这批著作中西方中心和变相维护资本主义制度的两个经典结论:中国社会主义革命具有父权本质;性/别系统和女性主义实践都应该具有自治独立性。第二部分将中国社会主义女性主义重置于反帝、反封建、反资本主义的具体历史场景中,重建社会主义女性主义在革命过程中体制化、整合化并成为多维性主体的特征。这篇文章的宗旨是批判性地修正现存有关第三世界社会主义女性主义的主流话语,为跨国女性主义实践和文化研究提供一个另类模式。
The first part of the essay critically re-assesses the influential scholarship on Chinese socialist revolution and women's eman- cipation produced in early and mid 1980s American academia, revealing its historical and political roots in the Cold War ideology and the liberal/radical feminism. Through a close analysis of Judith Stacey's Patriarchy and Socialist Revolution in China, the essay interro- gates the Western centered and pro-capitalist feminist conclusion that Chinese socialist revolution is essentially patriarchal and sex/gen- der system as well as feminist practice should be autonomous. The second part locates Chinese socialist feminism in its anti-imperialist, anti-feudalist, and anti-capitalist context, re-constructing it as a mainstream, institutionalized, integrated, and multifaceted practice in the socialist revolution (1921-1949 and beyond). The goal of this essay is to critically revise the dominant discourse on Third World socialist feminism and provide an alternative approach to transnational feminism and culture in history.
出处
《妇女研究论丛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第3期5-19,共15页
Journal of Chinese Women's Studies