期刊文献+

对幼女性法益的法律保障研究 被引量:5

Legal Protection of the Interests of Underage Girls
原文传递
导出
摘要 幼女的性法益是现代人权保护的重要内容,但是,中国法律制度尤其是刑法在保护幼女性法益方面仍然存在着一些问题。文章希望通过分析幼女性法益的特征、幼女性法益的法律保护标准来检讨中国法律对幼女性法益的保护状况,探讨在废除嫖宿幼女罪以完善幼女性法益的刑法保护的同时,加强对中国社会管理秩序维护的最佳方案。 How to protect the interests of underage girls by law is an important issue in the protection of human right in modem times. However, there are still problems in Chinese legal system, especially in the criminal law, in protecting the interests of underage girls. This article examines the legal specifics of the interests of underage girls, and identifies shortcomings in the protection of the interests of underage girls by the Chinese law based on a review of the legal protection standards applied to the interests of underage girls in dif- ferent systems under both the common law and the civil law traditions. This article explores ways to remove the offence of having com- mercial sex with underage girls in order to protect the legal interests of underage girls as well as to safeguard social order and public security.
作者 王世洲
机构地区 北京大学法学院
出处 《妇女研究论丛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第3期41-47,共7页 Journal of Chinese Women's Studies
关键词 幼女的性法益 强奸罪 奸淫幼女 嫖宿幼女罪 性自决权 legal interests of underage girls rape rape of girls of underage 14 offense of having commercial sex with underage girls right of self-determination on sexual matters
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1历代刑法志[M].北京:群众出版社,1988.
  • 2Peter Murphy Ed.. Blacks tone's Criminal Practice [M]. Oxford University Press, 2003.
  • 3Wayne R. LaFave. Criminal Law (4'h Edition)[M]. Thomson/West, 2003.
  • 4郎胜主编.中华人民共和国刑法释义(第5版)[M].北京:法律出版社,2011.
  • 5王世洲.现代刑罚目的理论与中国的选择[J].法学研究,2003,25(3):107-131. 被引量:121

二级参考文献6

  • 1[德]Hans-Heinrich Jescheck/Thomas Weigend,Lehrbuch des Strafrechts,AT,Duncker & Humblot/Berlin,1996,S.66.
  • 2[德]Claus Roxin: Strafrecht, Allgemeiner Teil, Band I, C.H.Beck's Verlagsbuchhandlung. 1997. S.67 ff.
  • 3James Fitzjames Stephen, A History of the Criminal Law of England 81 (1883),转引自Joshua Dressler,Understanding Criminal Law, 3^rd Edition, Lexis Publishing, 2001, p.17.
  • 4I Grenville Cross,SC & Patrick WS Cheung, Sentencing in Hong Kong 3rd, Butterworths 2000, p.652 ff.
  • 5The Problem of Justification and Excuse in the Chinese Criminal Law-A Commmentary from A Chinese Viewpoint, Rechtferfigung und Entschuldigung IV, Ostasiatiosch-deutsches Strafrechtskolloquium Tokio 1993, Beitraege und Materialien aus dem Max-Planck-Institut fuer auslaendisches und internationales Strafrecht Freiburg,Band S.48.
  • 6Heinz Koriath, Ueber Vereinigungstheorien als Rechtfertigung staatlicher Strafe, Jura 1995 Heft 12, S.626.

共引文献121

同被引文献49

引证文献5

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部