期刊文献+

基于需求不信任导致的保险金风险研究 被引量:7

Insurance Risk Management due to Distrusted Demand
下载PDF
导出
摘要 制造商在向供应商下达订单前,首先汇报其预测的市场需求。由于制造商的汇报需求和供应商用于产能决策的市场需求预测之间会有差异,这会导致供应商对制造商产生不信任。对于这种不信任建模,将其看作是一个随机变量,并通过保险金的方式来降低风险。博弈论方法严谨的论证了供应商产能设置、制造商汇报需求和保险金设置的决策过程。数值算例说明了该决策过程,并证明预测的需求差异越小则保险金费用越少。 We consider a supply chain consisting of a supplier and a manufacturer, which operates on the reported demand from the manufacturer, and there may be a gap between it and supplier's own demand estimate for deciding production capacity, due to potential distrust. We model this distrust as a random variable and use insurance to mitigate the risk due to the distrust. We then use game theory to rigorously analyze the issue with insurance premium. Numerical examples show that the insurance charge becomes less when the demand order is smaller (and the gap becomes smaller).
出处 《系统管理学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第3期428-435,共8页 Journal of Systems & Management
基金 国家自然科学基金重点项目(70732003)
关键词 信息分享 保险金机制 信任 博弈论 数值研究 information sharing insurance mechanism trust game theory numerical study
  • 相关文献

参考文献29

  • 1Ozer O, Zheng Yanchong, Chen Kay-Yut. Trust in forecast information sharing [ J ]. Management Science, 2011, 57(6) :1111-1137.
  • 2Files J. Economic downturn leaves Cisco with stacks of excess inventory[C] //San Jose Mercury News (April 27) 1C, 2001.
  • 3汪传旭,崔建新.ARMA(1,1)需求条件下需求信息延迟对两级供应链牛鞭效应和平均成本的影响[J].系统管理学报,2007,16(3):332-336. 被引量:9
  • 4陈长彬,杨忠.需求信息共享激励与供应链契约设计[J].系统管理学报,2008,17(6):639-647. 被引量:15
  • 5AvivY.Theeffectofcollaborativeforecastingonsupplychainperformance[J].ManagementScience,2001,47(10):1326-1343.
  • 6Lee H, Padmanahhan V, Whang S. Information distortion in a supply chain: The bullwhip effect[J]. Management Science, 1997, 3(4): 546-558.
  • 7Tang C S. Perspectives in supply chain risk management [J ]. International Journal Production Economics, 2006, 103: 451-488.
  • 8Tang Ou, Nurmaya M S. Identifying risk issues and research advancements in supply chain risk management [ J] . International Journal Production Economics, 2011, 133 : 25-34.
  • 9Ding Q, Dong L, Kouvelis P. On the integration of production and financial hedging decisions in global markets[J]. Operations Research, 2006, 55 (3) : 470- 489.
  • 10Kamrad B, Siddique A. Supply contracts, profit sharing, switching, and reaction options [J ]. Management Science, 2004, 50(1): 64-82.

二级参考文献22

  • 1潘会平,陈荣秋.供应链合作的利润分配机制研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2005,25(6):87-93. 被引量:109
  • 2王瑛.供应链伙伴信息共享的博弈与激励[J].中国管理科学,2005,13(5):61-66. 被引量:37
  • 3申悦,于瑞峰,吴甦,刘丽文.零售商B ertrand竞争下的供应链成本信息共享价值[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2005,45(11):1581-1584. 被引量:47
  • 4[1]Lee H L,Padmanabhan P,Whang S.Information distortion in a supply chain:the bullwhip effect[J].Management Science,1997,43:546-558.
  • 5[2]Lee H L,Padmanabhan P,Whang S.Bullwhip effect in a supply chain[J].Sloan Management Review,1997,38(Spring):93-102.
  • 6[3]Bourland K,Powell S,Pyke D.Exploring timely demand information to reduce inventories[J].European Journal of Operations Reseach,1996,92:239-253.
  • 7[4]Gavirneni S,Kapuscinski R,Tayur S.Value of information in capacitated supply chains[J].Management Science,1999,45(1):16-24.
  • 8[5]Lee H L,So Kut C,Tang Christopher S.The value of information sharing in a two-level supply chain[J].Management Science,2000,46(5):626-643.
  • 9[7]Zhang X.Delayed demand information and dampened bullwhip effect[J].Operations Research Letters,2005,33:289-294.
  • 10[2]Dejonckheere J,Disney S M,Lambrecht M R.The impact of information enrichment on the bullwhip effect in supply chain:a control engineering perspective[J].European Journal of Operational Research,2004,8(153):727-750.

共引文献22

同被引文献45

引证文献7

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部