一期、二期交锁髓内钉固定治疗GustiloⅡ型开放性胫骨骨折疗效对比研究被引量：2

A comparative study of clinical effects between one-stage and two-stage intramedullary interlocking nail fixation for treatment of Gustilo grade Ⅱ open tibial fractures

下载PDF

导出

摘要目的比较一期与二期交锁髓内钉内固定治疗GustiloⅡ型开放性胫骨骨折的疗效差异。方法回顾性分析2010年6月至2013年6月揭阳市人民医院收治的54例GustiloⅡ型开放性胫骨骨折患者的临床资料,其中32例行一期清创、交锁髓内钉内固定(一期内固定组),22例行一期清创、二期交锁髓内钉固定(二期内固定组)。观察两组患者Johner-Wruhs评分优良率、骨折愈合时间、住院时间、治疗费用及并发症等方面的差异。结果两组在Johner-Wruhs评分优良率、骨折愈合时间、伤口感染率方面差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);一期内固定组在伤口一期愈合率、住院时间及治疗费用方面优于二期内固定组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论一期、二期交锁髓内钉内固定治疗GustiloⅡ型开放性胫骨骨折安全有效,均能取得满意疗效;但与二期内固定相比,一期内固定治疗更能促进伤口愈合,缩短住院时间,费用更加低廉。 Objective To compare clinical efficacy between one-stage and two-stage intramedullary interlocking nail fixation for treatment of Gustilo grade Ⅱ open tibial fractures. Methods Data of 54 patients of Gustilo grade Ⅱ open tibial fractures treated in Jieyang People＇s Hospital from June 2010 to June 2013, were analyzed retrospectively. They were divided into 2 groups, 32 patients in one-stage fixation group were treated by one-stage debridement and intramedullary interlocking nail fixation, 22 patients in two-stage fixation group were treated by the first-stage debridement and the second-stage intramedullary interlocking nail fixation. Excellent and good rate of Johner-Wruhs scoring, fracture healing time, hospitalization time, treatment costs and complications＆nbsp;in two groups were observed. Results Differences of excellent and good rate of Johner-Wruhs scoring, fracture healing time and incidence of infection had no statistical differences between two groups （P 〉0.05）; While wound healing rate at one-stage, hospitalization time and treatment costs in one-stage fixation group were better than those in two-stage fixation group, there were statistical differences between two groups （P 〈0.05）. Conclusions Being safe and effective, one-stage or two-stage intramedullary interlocking nail fixation for Gustilo grade Ⅱ open tibial fractures could achieve similar efficacy, but compared with two-stage fixation, one-stage fixation could enhance wound healing better, shorten hospitalization time and decrease treatment costs.

作者徐耿填郭跃跃庄怀铭林勇彬林加阳王德春

机构地区揭阳市人民医院中山大学附属揭阳医院骨二科

出处《中国骨科临床与基础研究杂志》 2015年第1期29-33,共5页 Chinese Orthopaedic Journal of Clinical and Basic Research

关键词胫骨骨折骨折固定术髓内骨钉骨折愈合伤口愈合住院时间 Tibial fractures Fracture fixation,intramedullary Bone nails Fracture healing Wound healing Length of stay

分类号 R687.3 [医药卫生—骨科学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献17

1Gustilo RB, Merow RL, Templemn D. The management of open fractures [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1990, 72(2): 299-304.
2Ruedi TP, Buckley RE, Moran CG. AO Principles of fracture management [M]. 2nd ed. Stuttgart, NewYork: Thieme, 2007: 53-65.
3Johner R, Wruhs O. Classification of tibial shaft fractures and correlation with results after rigid fixation [J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1983(178): 7-25.
4Ryan SP, Pugliano V. Controversies in initial management of open fractta'es [J]. Scand J Surg, 2014, 103(2): 132-137.
5Mielsch N. Does timing to operative debridement influence the infection rate? [J]. Mielsch N, 2013, 151(6): 563.
6Ince A, Schiitze N, Karl N, et al. Gentamicin negatively influenced osteogenic function in vitro [J]. Int Orthop, 2007, 31(2): 223-228.
7Jorge-Mora A, Rodriguez-Martin J, Pretell-Mazzini J. Timing issue in open fractures debridement: a review article [J]. Eur J Orthop Surg Tranmatul, 2013, 23(2): 125-129.
8Kamat AS. Infection rates in open fractures of the tibia: is the 6-hour rule fact or fiction? [J]. Adv Orthop, 2011, 2011: 943495.
9Penn-Barwell JG, Murray CK, Wenke JC. Early antibiotics and debfidement in independently reduce infection in an open fracture model [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2012, 94(1): 107-112.
10Craig J, Fuchs T, Jenks M, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the additional benefit of local prophylactic antibiotic therapy for infection rates in open tibia fractures treated with intramedullary nailing [J]. Int Orthop, 2014, 38 (5): 1025-1030.

二级参考文献40

1王嘉宁,张世斌.小腿内侧胫骨骨膜皮瓣移植术[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2004,12(21):1748-1749. 被引量：7
2Holbrook JL,Swiontkowski JF,Sanders R.Treatment of open fractures of the tibial shaft:Ender nailing versus extemal fixation.A randomized prospective comparison.J Bone Joint Surg (Am),1989,71:1231-1228.
3Bach AW,Hansen ST.Plates versus external fixation in severe open tibial fractures:A randomized trial.Clin Orthop,1989,(241):89-94.
4Klein MP,Rahn BA,Frigg R,et al.Reaming versus non-reaming in medullary nailing:interference with cortical circulation of the canine tibia.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg,1990,77:490-493.
5Finkermeier CG,Schimdt AH,Kyle RF,et al.A prospective,randomized study of intramedullary nails inserted with and without reaming for the treatment of open and closed fractures of the tibial shaft.J Orthop Trauma,2000,14:187-193.
6Larsen LB,Madsen JE,Hoiness PR,et al.Should insertion of intramedullary nailing with and without reaming? A prospective randomized study with 3.8 years follow.J Orthop Trauma,2004,18:144-149.
7Whittle AP,Russell TA,Taylor JC,et al.Treatment of open fractures of the tibia shaft with the use of interlocking nailing without reaming.J Bone Joint Surg (Am),1992,74:1162-1171.
8Keating JF,O'Brien PI,Blachut PA,et al.Reamed interlocking intramedullary nailing of open fractures of the tibia.Clin Orthop,1997,(338):182-191.
9Keating JF,O'Brien PJ,Blachut PJ,et al.Locking intramedullary nailing with and without reamed for open fractures of the tibial shaft:a prospective,randomized study.J Bone Joint Surg (Am),1997,79:334-341.
10Toivanen JA,Vaeistoe O,Kannus P,et al.Anterior knee pain after intramedullary nailing of fractures of the bibial shaft:a prospective,randomized study comparing two different nail-insertion techniques.J Bone Joint Surg (Am),2002,84:580-585.