期刊文献+

受害者敏感性与报复、宽恕的关系:沉思的中介作用 被引量:4

Relationship between Victim Sensitivity and Vengefulness,Forgivingness:Mediating Role of Rumination
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:考察受害者敏感性与报复、宽恕的关系及沉思的中介作用。方法:以332名成人为被试,施测受害者敏感性量表、宽恕他人量表中的7个测量报复的条目、宽恕量表和事件影响量表中的侵扰分量表中文修订版。结果:受害者敏感性与报复呈显著正相关(r=0.343,P<0.01),与宽恕呈显著负相关(r=-0.345,P<0.01);在受害者敏感性对报复的预测中,沉思发挥了中介作用,中介效应占总效应的比例为17.4%;在受害者敏感性对宽恕的预测中,沉思发挥了中介作用,中介效应占总效应的比例为21.4%。结论:沉思在受害者敏感性与报复、宽恕之间均起到部分中介作用。 Objective:To study the relationship between victim sensitivity and vengefulness,forgivingness,and the mediating role of rumination.Methods:A total of 332 adults were asked to complete the victim sensitivity questionnaire,seven items from the Forgiveness of Others Scale to assess vengefulness,TFS(Trait Forgiveness Scale) and the Intrusiveness subscale of IES-R(Impact of Event Scale-Revised).Results:Victim sensitivity was significantly positively correlated with vengefulness(r = 0.343,P〈0.01),and significantly negatively correlated with forgivingness(r =-0.345,P〈0.01); It had partial mediating effect of rumination when victim sensitivity was taken as a predictor to the vengefulness,and the ratio was 17.4%; It had partial mediating effect of rumination when victim sensitivity was taken as a predictor to the forgiveness,and the ratio was 21.4%.Conclusion:Rumination has partial mediating effects between victim sensitivity and vengefulness and between victim sensitivity and forgiveness
出处 《中国健康心理学杂志》 2015年第5期727-730,共4页 China Journal of Health Psychology
基金 浙江省哲社规划课题(编号:10CJY17YBQ)
关键词 受害者敏感性 报复 宽恕 沉思 中介效应 Victim sensitivity Vengefulness Forgivingness Rumination Mediating effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Greenberg J.Losing sleep over organizational injustice:Attenuating insomniac reactions to underpayment inequity with supervisory training in interactional justice[J].Journal of Applied Psychology,2006,91(1):58-59.
  • 2Mikula G,Wenzel M.Justice and social conflict[J].International Journal of Psychology,2000,35(2):126-135.
  • 3Van den Bos K,Maas M,Waldring I E,et al.Toward understanding the psychology of reactions to perceived fairness:The role of affect intensity[J].Social Justice Research,2003,16(2):151-168.
  • 4Schmitt M.Individual differences in sensitivity to befallen injustice(SBI)[J].Personality and Individual Differences,1996,21(1):3-20.
  • 5Gollwitzer M,Schmitt M,Schalke R,et al.Asymmetrical effects of justice sensitivity perspectives on prosocial and antisocial behavior[J].Social Justice Research,2005,18(2):183-201.
  • 6Schmitt M,Gollwitzer M,Maes J,et al.Justice sensitivity:Assessment and location in the personality space[J].European Journal of Psychological Assessment,2005,21(3):202-211.
  • 7Fetchenhauer D,Huang X.Justice sensitivity and distributive decisions in experimental games[J].Personality and Individual Differences,2004,36(5):1015-1029.
  • 8Strelan P,Sutton R M.When just-world beliefs promote and when they inhibit forgiveness[J].Personality and Individual Differences,2011,50(2):163-168.
  • 9Gollwitzer M,Rothmund T,Pfeiffer A,et al.Why and when justice sensitivity leads to pro-and antisocial behavior[J].Journal of Research in Personality,2009,43(6):999-1005.
  • 10Mc Cullough M E,Bellah C G,Kilpatrick S D,et al.Vengefulness:Relationships with forgiveness,rumination,well-being,and the Big Five[J].Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,2001,27(5):601-610.

二级参考文献46

共引文献193

同被引文献116

引证文献4

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部