期刊文献+

多孔钛合金表面镁涂层改性及其成骨效应的实验研究 被引量:5

Surface modification of porous titanium alloy by magnesium coating and its effect on bone formation
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨多孔钛合金表而镁涂层改性材料的制备方法及其成骨效应. 方法 采用真空离子镀技术在多孔钛合金材料内、外表面制备镁金属涂层.扫描电镜观察材料表面及孔隙内部涂层形态,能谱分析涂层的元素组成.取成年家兔24只,随机分为2组(n=12),建立双侧股骨外侧髁部骨缺损模型,分别植入未涂层的多孔钛合金(对照组)和镁涂层多孔钛合金(实验组),于取材前2周及前2d分别荧光标记骨小梁.术后2、4、8周取材,应用显微CT检测成骨情况,硬组织切片荧光显微镜观察骨小梁的生长速率,Van Gieson染色后光镜下观察材料周围的成骨情况. 结果 电镜下镁涂层致密且形态规则,与材料表面结合良好,能谱分析显示镁元素存在于材料表面.显微CT结果显示:术后4、8周实验组的新生骨体积百分比平均分别为7.81% ±1.21%、16.83%±2.39%,均显著高于对照组(5.38%±0.75%、12.08%±1.58%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).荧光双标的骨小梁染色结果显示:术后4、8周实验组材料周围双标骨小梁之间的距离平均分别为(49.96 ±5.34)、(67.25±6.75) μm,均显著大于对照组[(26.08±3.64)、(34.69±8.71) μm],差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).组织学结果显示:术后4、8周实验组材料新生骨面积百分比平均分别为9.37%±1.66%、16.51%±3.06%,均显著大于对照组(6.70%±0.79%、l2.1 8%±2.44%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 多孔钛合金表面镁涂层改性处理对多孔材料内部的骨长人和骨修复具有明显的促进作用. Objective To investigate the osteogenic ability of porous titanium alloy with its surface modified by magnesium coating.Methods Porous titanium allov (PTA) was coated with magnesium by vacuum ion plating.Surface morphology of PTA scaffolds was observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) for analysis of elements of the scaffolds by energy disperse spectroscopy (EDS).Twenty-four rabbits were used to create models of bone defects of lateral condyle femur at both femurs and randomized into 2 even groups (n =12).PTA scaffolds were implanted into the defects in the control group while modified PTA scaffolds in the experimental group.Tetracyeline and calcein were injected into the animals at 2 weeks and 2 days before specinens were harvested at 2,4 and 8 weeks postoperation for Micro-CT and histomorphology observations of bone formation,growth rate of bone trabeculae and osteogenesis around the experimental materials.Results SEM revealed the dense and regular magnesium coating attached the matrix very.well.EDS showed the scaffolds were coated with magnesium.Micro-CT revealed that the volumes of bone regeneration in the experimental group at 4 weeks and 8 weeks (7.81% ± 1.21% and 16.83% ± 2.39%) were significantly higher than those in the control group (5.38% ± 0.75% and 12.08% ± 1.58%) (P 〈 0.05).Fluorescent labeling revealed that the distances between the labeling bone trabeculae around the material in the experimental group at 4 weeks and 8 weeks (49.96 ± 5.34 μm and 67.25 ± 6.75 μm) were significantly longer than those in the control group (26.08 ±3.64 μm and 34.69 ±8.71 μm) (P 〈 0.05).The histomorphology (Van Gieson staining) revealed that the percentages of bone regeneration in the experimental group at 4 weeks and 8 weeks (9.37% ± 1.66% and 16.51% ±3.06%) were significantly larger than those in the control group (6.70% ± 0.79% and 12.18% ± 2.44%) (P 〈 0.05).Conclusion Compared with porous titanium scaffolds,the magnesium-coated porous titanium scaffolds possess a better capacity of osteoconductivity and osteogenesis.
出处 《中华创伤骨科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第5期438-443,共6页 Chinese Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
关键词 生物相容性材料 合金 Biocompatible materials Titanium Alloys Magnesium
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1Qiu x, Wan P, Tan L, et al. Preliminary research on a novel bioactive silicon doped calcium phosphate coating on AZ31 magnesium alloy via electrodeposition[J] . Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 2014, 36: 65-76.
  • 2Tan L, Wang Q, Lin X, et al. Loss of mechanical properties in vivo and bone-implant interface strength of AZ31 B magnesium alloy screws withSi-containingcoating[J]. ActaBiomater, 2014, 10(5): 2333-2340.
  • 3Li J. Behaviour of titanium and titania-based ceramics in vivo and in vivo[J]. Biomaterials, 1993, 14(3): 229-232.
  • 4Abdel-Hady Gepreel M, Niinomi M. Biocompatibility of Ti-alloys for long-term implantation[J]. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 2013, 20: 407 -415.
  • 5Kim DG, Huja SS, Tee BC, et rd. Bone ingrowth and initial stabihty of titanium and porous tantalum dental implants: a pilot canine study [J]. Implant Dent, 2013, 22(4): 399-405.
  • 6Ryan G, Pandit A, Apatsidis DP. Fabrication methods of porous metals for use in orthopaedic applications[J] . Biomaterials, 2006, 27(13): 2651-2670.
  • 7Holy CE, Fialkov JA, Davies JE, et al. Use of a biomimetic strategy to engineer hone[J] . J Biomed Mater Res A, 2003, 65(4): 447-453.
  • 8Krishna BV, Bose S, Bandyopadhyay A. Low stiffness porous Ti structures for load-bearing implants[J]. Aeta Biomater, 2007, 3(6): 997-1006.
  • 9Li XK, Yuan CF, Wang JL, et al. The treatment effect of porous ti- tanium al|oy rod on the early stage talar osteonecrosis of sheep[J] . PLoS One, 2013, 8(3): e58459.
  • 10Wu SH, Li Y, Zhang YQ, et al. Porous titanium-6 aluminum-4 vanadium cage has better osseointegration and less micromotion than a poly-ether-ether-ketone cage in sheep vertebral fusion[J] . Artif Or- gans, 2013, 37(12): E191-E201.

二级参考文献104

共引文献81

同被引文献28

引证文献5

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部