期刊文献+

基于微水试验倾斜承压含水层水文地质参数的推估 被引量:7

Hydrogeological Parameter Estimations for Slug Test in Sloping Confined Aquifer
原文传递
导出
摘要 为了准确的推估出倾斜承压含水层的水文地质参数,有必要考虑倾角对于参数推估的影响.通过建立倾斜承压含水层微水试验的数学模型,利用理论和现场试验数据分析方法,得出倾角对导水系数等水文地质参数推估的影响.结果表明:低渗透条件下,倾角越大非振荡水位恢复速度越快;高渗透条件下,倾角越大振荡水位振幅越大.储水系数越大倾角上限越小,倾角影响越明显,而倾角上限对于导水系数的变化不敏感.根据该结论建立了无因次储水系数和倾角界限之间的经验方程,用于预测倾角是否会影响水文地质参数的推估.当实测倾角大于倾角上限时,倾角影响不可以被忽略,忽略倾角会导致导水系数估值偏高,储水系数估值偏低. It is necessary to take into account the dip angle effects on accurate estimation of hydrogeological parameters in the sloping confined aquifer. To explore how the dip angle influences the test response, a new slug test model is developed in this study by using theoretical and filed data analysis. For test well, it is found that when the aquifer hydraulic conductivity is rela- tively low, a larger dip angle causes a faster recovery of the non-oscillatory test response; when the aquifer hydraulic conductiv- ity is relatively high, a larger dip angle causes an increase of amplitude of the oscillatory test response. The dip angle effect is more pronounced for a larger storage coefficient, being less sensitive to the change of transmissivity. An empirical relationship is developed for the limiting dip angle as a function of the dimensionless storage coefficient. The function can be used to predict whether the estimate of hydrogeological parameters would be influenced by the dip angle. The effect can be neglected if the dip angle is less than the upper limit. However, it cannot be neglected if the dip angle is larger than the upper limit, otherwise, it can result in an overestimate of transmissivity and an underestimate of the storage coefficient.
出处 《地球科学(中国地质大学学报)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第5期925-932,共8页 Earth Science-Journal of China University of Geosciences
基金 国家重点基础研究发展计划"973"项目(No.2010CB428804) 北京岩溶水资源勘查评价工程专题类第一项:数值模拟项目(No.BJYRS-ZT-01-01)
关键词 微水试验 倾角 现场试验数据分析 水文地质 地下水. slug test dip angle field data analysis hydrogeology ground water.
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献10

  • 1黄先伍,唐平,缪协兴,陈占清.破碎砂岩渗透特性与孔隙率关系的试验研究[J].岩土力学,2005,26(9):1385-1388. 被引量:43
  • 2McElwee, C. D.. Improving the analysis of slug tests [ J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2002, 269:122 - 133.
  • 3McElwee, C. D., Bohling, G. C., Butler Jr., J. J.. Sensitivity analysis of slug tests. Partl. The slugged well [ J]. Journal of Hydrology, 1995, 164 : 53 - 67.
  • 4McElwee, C. D., Butler Jr., J. J., Bohling, G. C., Liu, W. Sensitivity analysis of slug tests. Part 2. Observation wells [J]. Journal of Hydrology, 1995, 164:69 -87.
  • 5R. Byron Bird, Warren E. Stewart, Edwin N. Lightfoot. LIGHTFOOT E N. Transport Phenomena (Second Edition ) IMP. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc. , 2002.
  • 6Kipp Jr. , Kenneth L.. Type curve analysis of inertial effects in the response of a well to a slug test [ J ]. Water Resources Research, 1985, 21 (9): 1397 -1408.
  • 7Cooper Jr HH, Bredehoeft JD, Papadopulos IS. Papadopulos. Response of a finite diameter well to an instantaneous charge of water [J]. Water Resources Research, 1967, 3 ( 1 ) : 263 - 269.
  • 8周志芳,王仲夏,曾新翔,杨建,陈卫东.岩土体渗透性参数现场快速测试系统开发[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2008,27(6):1292-1296. 被引量:20
  • 9张文杰,陈云敏.垃圾填埋场抽水试验及降水方案设计[J].岩土力学,2010,31(1):211-215. 被引量:13
  • 10ZHAO Yan-rong ZHOU Zhi-fang.A FIELD TEST DATA RESEARCH BASED ON A NEW HYDRAULIC PARAMETERS QUICK TEST TECHNOLOGY[J].Journal of Hydrodynamics,2010,22(4):562-571. 被引量:7

共引文献13

同被引文献45

引证文献7

二级引证文献48

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部