摘要
政府采购是自主创新政策的主要实施手段,我国政府采购类自主创新措施或者规定符合采购要求的产品是由中国公民或法人享有知识产权,或者要求政府订购产品合同只能授予中国法人。这些措施引发了外国政府和企业"关于贸易保护主义"的关注。由于"非违法之诉"在TRIPs协定项下的适用受到暂停适用期的限制,我国的自主创新措施可能引起《政府采购协定》项下的"非违法之诉",一方面,我国的自主创新措施构成GATT1994第23条第1款(b)项下的措施,另一方面其他成员方根据《中国加入议定书》和《工作组报告》存在合法期待的"利益"。
Government procurement is the main instrument of implementation of indigenous innovation policy, China's indigenous measures in government procurement field require either the product meet the requirement of Intellectual Property Right owned by Chinese citizen or legal personal, or procurement contract can only be awarded to Chinese legal person. These measures led to concern by foreign governments and enterprises about the trade protectionism. China's indigenous innovation measures may establish Non-violation Complaint under GPA, on the one hand, China 's indigenous innovation measures constitute "measures" under Article XXIII : 1 (b) , on the other hand, a benefit may have accrued under the Accession Protocol and the Working Party Report.
出处
《河北法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第6期124-134,共11页
Hebei Law Science
基金
国家社科基金一般项目<国际贸易中的数字知识产权执法研究>(13BFX156)
中国博士后科学基金面上资助项目第57批的支持