期刊文献+

药品可互换性评价的新标化转换准则(英文) 被引量:1

A new scaled criterion for drug interchangeability
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文对仿制药的生物等效性和相似性评价的现有准则进行了综述。这些准则包括平均生物等效性、总群体生物等效性和个体生物等效性(IBE),以及近期提出的关于高个体差异药品的"标化转换均值生物等效性(SABE)"等。除此之外,随着对个体生物等效性(IBE)的扩展和标化转换均值生物等效性(SABE)评价法的建立,本文也提出了药品可互换性的新的评价准则。本文采用数值型研究对该新准则的应用进行了论证。该评价准则除用于仿制药品的可互换性评价外,也可用于评价生物类似制品可互换性评价。 Criteria are reviewed for the assessment of bioequivalence and biosimilarity of generic drug products. The criteria include those for average bioequivalence, for population and individual bioequivalence ( IBE ) , and a recently proposed scaled average bioequivalence (SABE)criterion for highly variable drugs. In addition, extending an idea of IBE and the development of SABE, a new criterion for the assessment of interchangeability is proposed. A numerical study was conducted to illustrate the use of the proposed criterion. In addition to the assessment of drug interchange- ability of generic drug products, the proposed criterion can be applied to the evaluation of drug interchangeability of biosimilar products.
出处 《药物分析杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第5期844-848,共5页 Chinese Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis
关键词 个体生物利用度 药品互换性 高个体差异类药物 标化转换的平均生物利用度(SABE) individual bioequivalence drug interchangeability highly variable drugs scaled average bioequiva-lence
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1CHOW SC, LIU JP. Design and Analysis of Bioavailability and Bioequivalence Studies [ M ]. 3rd ed. New York: Chapman and Hall/CRC Press, Taylor & Francis,2008.
  • 2FDA. Guidance for Industry:Statistical Approaches to Establis- hing Bioequivalence[ S]. 2001.
  • 3CHOW SC. Individual bioequivalence--a review of FDA draft guidance[ J]. Drug Inf J, 1999,33 (2) :435.
  • 4ENDRENYI L, AMIDON GL, MIDHA KK, et al. Individual bio- equivalence: attractive in principle, difficult in practice [ J ]. Pharm Res, 1998,15 (9) : 1321.
  • 5FDA. Guidance on Bioavailability and Bioequivalence Studies for Orally Administrated Drug Products--General Considerations [ S ]. 2003.
  • 6TOTHFALUSI L, ENDRENYI L. Limits for the scaled average bioequivalence of highly variable drugs and drug products [ J ]. Pharm Res,2003,20 ( 3 ) :382.
  • 7TOTHFALUSI L, ENDRENYI L, GARCfA-ARIETA A. Evalua- tion of bioequivalence for highly-varlable drugs with scaled aver- age bioequivalence[ J]. Clin Pharmacokinet,2009,48 ( 11 ) :725.
  • 8HAIDAR SH, DAVIT B, CHEN ML, et al. Bioequivalence approa- ches for highly variable drugs and drug products[ J]. Pharm Res, 2008,25 ( 1 ) :237.
  • 9DAVIT BM, CHEN ML,CONNER DP, et al. Implementation of a reference-scaled average bioequivalence approach for highly vari- able generic drug products by the US Food and Drug Administra- tion[J]. AAPS J,2012,14(4) :915.
  • 10EMA. Guideline on the Investigation of Bioequivalence[ S]. 2010.

同被引文献11

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部