期刊文献+

国内中药药物经济学评价的系统评价及质量评估 被引量:16

Systematic economic assessment and quality evaluation for traditional Chinese medicines
原文传递
导出
摘要 为了解国内文献关于中药药物经济学研究情况,以分析国内中药药物经济学评价研究现状,探求其所存在的问题。运用计算机检索中文期刊全文数据库(CNKI)、中文科技期刊全文数据库(VIP)、万方数据库、中国生物医学文摘数据库(CBM),纳入截止2014年为止所有国内专业期刊上发表的中药药物经济学评价文献进行系统评估和质量评价。研究最终纳入文献50篇,从文题、年份、作者身份、经费来源、研究疾病种类、研究角度、研究设计类型、研究目标人群情况、研究目标人群来源、研究时限、成本计算、效果指标、分析技术和敏感度分析等多方面对纳入中药药物经济学文献进行系统评价及质量评估,最终质量水平得分0.74,文献质量偏低。研究结果发现目前存在中药药物经济学研究探索相对较少、研究时限不足够长、评价方法过于单一等问题,这也将是今后不懈努力的方向。 To learn about the economic studies on traditional Chinese medicines in domestic literatures, in order to analyze the cur- rent economic assessment of traditional Chinese medicines and explore the existing problems. Efforts were made to search CNKI, VIP, Wanfang database and CBM by computer and include all literatures about economic assessment of traditional Chinese medicines pub- lished on professional domestic journals in the systematic assessment and quality evaluation. Finally, 50 articles were included in the study, and the systematic assessment and quality evaluation were made for them in terms of titles, year, authors' identity, expense source, disease type, study perspective, study design type, study target, study target source, time limit, cost calculation, effect indicator, analytical technique and sensitivity analysis. The finally quality score was 0.74, which is very low. The results of the study showed insufficient studies on economics of traditional Chinese medicines, short study duration and simple evaluation methods, which will be solved through unremitting efforts in the future.
机构地区 天津中医药大学
出处 《中国中药杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第10期2050-2053,共4页 China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica
基金 国家重点基础研究发展计划(973)项目(2012CB518401 2009CB523003) 教育部创新团队发展计划项目(IRT1276)
关键词 中药药物经济学 系统评价 质量评估 traditional Chinese medicine drug economics system evaluation quality assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1Drummond M F,Stoddart G L,Torrance G W.Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press,1987:28.
  • 2Chiou C F,Hay J W,Wallace J F,et al.Development and validation of a grading system for the quality of cost-effectiveness studies[J].Med Care,2003,41(1):32.
  • 3Sara H Downs,Nick Black.The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assement of methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care intervention[J].Epidemiol Community Health,1988,52(6):377.

同被引文献226

引证文献16

二级引证文献89

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部