期刊文献+

吉西他滨单药/或联合铂类与紫杉类单药/或联合铂类不同顺序治疗晚期肺鳞癌的疗效与安全性 被引量:5

Sequential Treatment of Advanced Squamous Lung Cancer: First-line Gemcitabine +/- platinum Followed by Second-line Taxanes +/- platinum Versus Reverse Sequence
下载PDF
导出
摘要 背景与目的吉西他滨和紫杉类药物是晚期肺鳞癌常用的化疗药物,但二者在一、二线治疗中的最佳顺序尚未明确,本研究旨在分析吉西他滨单药/或联合铂类同紫杉类药物单药/或联合铂类在一、二线治疗中不同化疗顺序的疗效及毒副作用。方法回顾性分析了105例IIIb期-IV期肺鳞癌患者,49例为一线予吉西他滨单药/或联合铂类,进展后二线予紫杉类单药/或联合铂类治疗(G-T组);56例为一线予紫杉类单药/或联合铂类,进展后二线予吉西他滨单药/或联合铂类治疗(T-G组)。主要研究终点为总生存(overall survival,OS),次要研究终点为无进展生存期(progression-free survival,PFS)、客观缓解率(objective response rate,ORR)、疾病控制率(disease control rate,DCR)及不良反应。结果 1G-T组与T-G组中位OS分别为为18.5个月和19.0个月(P=0.520)。2G-T组与T-G组一线化疗中位PFS1分别为5.0个月和4.0个月(P=0.584);两组二线化疗中位PFS2为2.5个月和2.7个月(P=0.432)。3G-T组与T-G组一线化疗ORR1分别为36.73%和33.92%(P=0.577),DCR1分别为79.59%和89.29%(P=0.186);二线化疗ORR2分别为4.08%和5.36%(P=0.085),DCR2分别为51.02%和66.07%(P=0.118)。4G-T组与T-G组毒副作用相似,但G-T组更易出现III级-IV级红细胞减低(P=0.027)和血小板减低(P=0.002)。结论一线吉西他滨单药/或联合铂类序贯二线紫杉类单药/或联合铂类与一线紫杉类单药/或联合铂类序贯二线吉西他滨单药/或联合铂类疗效相当,不良反应可耐受,两种序贯模式均对初治晚期肺鳞癌患者有效。 Background and objective Gemcitabine and taxanes are effective agents commonly used in advanced squamous lung cancer. hTe best treatment sequence, however, is unclear to our knowledge. So we conducted this retrospective study in order to compare the effcacy and toxicities of ifrst-line Gemcitabine+/-platinum followed by second-line taxanes+/-platinum with the reverse sequence. Methods We totally analyzed 105 patients with stage IIIb-IV squamous lung cancer in our retrospective study. hTere were 49 patients receiving gemcitabine+/-platinum ifrst-line followed by taxanes+/-plati-num second-line (G-T group), and 56 patients receiving taxanes+/-platinum ifrst-line followed by gemcitabine+/-platinum second-line (T-G group). hTe primary endpoint of the study was overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and toxicities. Results hTe me-dian OS were 18.5 mo in G-T group and 19.0 mo in T-G group (P=0.520). hTe median PFS1 was 5.0 mo and 4.0 mo with ifrst-line gemcitabine+/-platinum and taxanes+/-platinum, respectively (P=0.584). hTe median PFS2 was 2.7 mo and 2.5 mo with second-line gemcitabine+/-platinum and taxanes+/-platinum (P=0.432). hTe ORR1 of G-T group and T-G group were 36.73%and 33.92%(P=0.577), and DCR1 were 79.59%and 89.29%(P=0.186);the ORR2 of G-T group and T-G group were 4.08%and 5.36%(P=0.085), and DCR2 were 51.02%and 66.07%, respectively (P=0.118). Hematologic toxicities was more frequent in G-T group, the patients experienced more grade 3-4 lower hemoglobin (P=0.027) and thrombocytopenia (P=0.002). Conclusion hTe effcacy of ifrst line gemcitabine+/-platinum followed by second line taxanes+/-platinum and the reverse sequence was similar, and the toxicities was tolerable. Both sequential patterns were effective in advanced squamous lung cancer.
机构地区 解放军第
出处 《中国肺癌杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第5期308-314,共7页 Chinese Journal of Lung Cancer
基金 首都医学发展科研基金(No.2007-3042)资助~~
关键词 肺肿瘤 化疗 顺序治疗 Lung neoplasms Chemotherapy Sequential treatment
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Carney DN. Lung cancer-time to move on from chemotherapy. N Engl J Med, 2002, 346(2): 126-128.
  • 2Wu YL, Lu S, Cheng Y, et al. Efficacy and safety ofpemetrexed/cisplatin versus gemcitabine/cisplatin as first-line treatment in Chinese patients with advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer, 2014, 85(3): 401-407.
  • 3Chute JP, Chen T, Feigal E, et al. Twenty years of phase III trials for patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: perceptible progress. J Clin On- col, 1999, 17(6): 1794-1801.
  • 4Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Collaborative Group. Chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis using updated data on individual pa- tients from 52 randomised clinical trials. BMJ, 1995, 311 (7010): 899-909.
  • 5NSCLC Meta-Analyses Collaborative Group. Chemotherapy in addition to supportive care improves survival in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data from 16 randomized controlled trials. J Clin Onco], 2008, 26(28): 4617-4625.
  • 6Souquet PJ, Chauvin F, BoisselJP, et al. Polychemotherapy in advanced non small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis. Lancet, 1993, 342(8862): 19-21.
  • 7Azzoli CG, Baker S Jr, Temin S, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncol- ogy Clinical Practice Guideline update on chemotherapy for stage 1V non- small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol, 2009, 27(36): 6251-6266.
  • 8Fossella F, Pereira JR, yon Pawel J, et aI. Randomized, multinational, phase III study of docetaxel plus platinum combinations versus vinorelbine pluscisplatin for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: the TAX 326 study group.J Clin Oncol, 2003, 21(16): 3016-3024.
  • 9Fisher MD, D' Orazio A. Phase II and III trials: comparison of four chemo- therapy regimens in advanced non small cell lung cancer (ECOG 1594). Clin Lung Cancer, 2000, 2(1): 21-22.
  • 10Grossi F, Aita M, Defferrari C, et al. Impact of third-generation drugs on the activity of first-line chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analytlcal approach. Oncologist, 2009,14(5): 497-510.

同被引文献43

  • 1胡夕春,蔡扬,杨新苗,李进.肿瘤化疗用药方法的研究进展[J].世界临床药物,2005,26(11):646-649. 被引量:19
  • 2陈志明,马常英,赵玉芳.三维适形放疗联合化疗治疗肺鳞癌的临床观察[J].齐齐哈尔医学院学报,2007,28(15):1810-1811. 被引量:1
  • 3American Cancer Society.Global Cancer Facts & Figures 2013[R].3rd Edition.Atlanta:American Cancer Society,2013.
  • 4D'Angelo SP,Pietanza MC,Johnson ML,et al.Incidence of EGFR exon 19 deletions and L858R in tumor specimens from men and cigarette smokers with lung adenocarcinomas[J].J Clin Oncol,2011,29(15);2066-2070.doi:10.12(X)/JC0.2010.32.6181.
  • 5Zhou C,Wu YL,Chen G,et al.Erlotinib versus chemother- apy as first-line treatment for patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer(OPTIMAL, CTONG-0802):a multicentre,open-label,randomised, phase 3 study[J].Lancet Oncol,2011,12(8):735-742.doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70184-X.
  • 6Mok TS,Wu Y,Nakagawa K,et al.Gefitinib/chemotherapy vs. chemotherapy in epidermal growth factor receptor(EGFR)muta- tion positive non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC)after progression on first-line gefitinib:The phase DI,randomised IMPRESS study[C]//2014 ESMO Annual Meeting Proceedings.Madrid,2014.
  • 7Gazdar AF.Activating and resistance mutations of EGFR in non-small-cell lung cancer:role in clinical response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors[J].Oncogene,2009,28(Suppl I):S24-S31.doi:10.1038/onc.2009.198.
  • 8Park K,Ahn M,Yu C,et al.ASPIRATION:firet-line erlotinib(E) until and beyond RECIST progression(PD)in Asian patients(pts) with EGFR mutation-positive(mut+)NSCLC[C]//2014 ESMO Annual Meeting Proceeding.Madrid,2014.
  • 9Jadad A R,Moore R A,Carroll D,et al.Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials:is blinding necessary?[J].Controlled Clinical Trials,1996,17(1):1-12.
  • 10Miller VA,Hirsh V,Cadranel J,et al.Afatinib versus pla- cebo for patients with advanced,metastatic non--small- cell lung cancer after failure of erlotinib,gefitinib,or both, and one or two lines of chemotherapy(LUX-Lung I):a phase 2b/3 randomised trial[J].Lancet Oncol,2012,13(5):528-538.doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70087-6.

引证文献5

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部