期刊文献+

碳源种类对同步脱氮除磷颗粒污泥除磷性能的影响 被引量:1

Phosphorus Removal Characteristics of Simultaneous Phosphorus and Nitrogen Granular Sludge Fed With Different Carbon Sources
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以厌氧/好氧交替运行培养的具有脱氮除磷功能的颗粒污泥为对象,研究不同碳源条件下对除磷特性的影响。研究结果显示,醋酸钠为单一碳源培养的颗粒污泥呈淡黄色,粒径分布较均匀,主要为双球菌和短杆菌,磷平均去除率为84.77%,厌氧末端释磷量平均为89.76 mg/L,最大释磷和吸磷速率分别为106.33mg/(g·h)和50.92 mg/(g·h);乙酸钠葡萄糖为复合碳源培养的颗粒污泥呈白色和淡黄色,粒径分布不均匀,主要为单球菌,磷平均去除率为93.06%,厌氧末端释磷量平均为75.52 mg/L,最大释磷和吸磷速率分别为92.84 mg/(g·h)和28.23 mg/(g·h),两种碳源条件下表现出良好的除磷能力。 The nitrogen and phosphorus removal granular sludge under the anaerobic / aerobic alternative operation is studied and the influence of carbon sources is researched. The granular sludge fed with sodium acetate is faint yellow in color,uniformity in diameter distribution,diplococcus and brevibacterium in bacterial mopphology. The average phosphorus removal efficiency is 84. 77%,the average content of release phosphorus up to 89. 76 mg / L at the anaerobic stage and the maximum phosphorus release and uptake rate is 106. 33 mg /( g·h) and 50. 92 mg /( g·h) respectively. The granular sludge fed with sodium acetate and glucose is white or faint yellow in color,uneven in diameter distribution,monococcus in bacterial morphology. The average phosphorus removal efficiency is 93. 06%,the average content of release phosphorus is 75. 52% mg / L at the anaerobic stage and the maximum phosphorus release and uptake rate is 92. 84 mg /( g·h) and 28.23 mg /( g·h) respectively. The two kinds of granular sludge show high- efficiency phosphorus removal performance.
出处 《工业安全与环保》 北大核心 2015年第5期4-7,共4页 Industrial Safety and Environmental Protection
基金 国家自然科学基金(21407114) 中建三局机电工程有限公司科技与设计部资助项目(20141h0335) 旱区地下水文与生态效应教育部重点实验室资助项目
关键词 颗粒污泥 除磷 碳源 granular sludge phosphorus removal carbon sources
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1彭永臻.SBR法的五大优点[J].中国给水排水,1993,9(2):29-31. 被引量:177
  • 2李安安,李勇智,祝贵兵,彭永臻.活性污泥体系中聚糖菌的富集与鉴定[J].环境工程学报,2009,3(5):927-931. 被引量:7
  • 3王亚宜,鲁文敏,杨健,高乃云.基于聚糖菌和聚磷菌竞争的代谢模型及影响因素[J].环境科学学报,2009,29(6):1131-1138. 被引量:11
  • 4Carueci A, Lindrea K, Majone M, et al. Different mechanisms for the anaerobic storage of organic substrates and their effect on enhanced biological phosphate removal (EBPR)[J]. Water Sci- ence and Technology, 1999, 39(6): 21- 28.
  • 5国家环保局 水和废水监测分析方法编委会.水和废水监测分析方法[M]第4版[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2002.271-274.
  • 6He S, Gu A Z, McMahon K D. Fine- scale differences be- tween accumullbacter- like bacteria in enhanced biological phosphorus removal activated sludge [ J ]. Water Science and Technology, 2006, 54(1): 111 - 118.
  • 7Snitldn E S, Dudley A M, Janse D M, et al. Model- driven analysis of experimentally determined growth phenotypes for 465 yeast gene deletion mutants under 16 different conditions [ J]. C, enome Biol, 2008, 9(9): R140.
  • 8Mishima K, Nakamura M. Self- inanobilizafion of aerobic acti- vated sludge--a pilot study of the aerobic upflow sludge blanket process in municipal sewage treatment [ J ]. Water Science & Technology, 1991, 23(4 - 6) : 981 - 990.
  • 9Jeon C O, Lee D S, ParkJ M. Morphological characteristics of microbial sludge performing enhanced biological phosphorus re- rnoval in a sequencing batch reactor fed with glucose as sole carbon source[ J]. Environmental Biotechnology, 2000, 41 (12): 79-84.
  • 10Seviour R J, Mino T, Onuki M. The microbiology d biological phosphorus removal in activated sludge systems[ I]. Few.s Mi- crobiology Reviews, 2003, 27(1). 99-127.

二级参考文献46

  • 1Barnard J L,Steichen M T.2006.Where is biological nutrient removal going on?[J].Water Science and Technology,53(3):155-164.
  • 2Brdjanovic D,Logemann S,van Loosdrecht M C M,et al.1998.Influence of temperature on biological phosphorus removal:Process and molecular ecological studies[J].Water Research,32(4):1035-1048.
  • 3Cech J S,Hartman P.1993.Competition between polyphosphate and polysaccharide accumulating bacteria in enhanced biological phosphate removal systems[J].Water Research,27(7):1219-1225.
  • 4Erdal U G,Erdal Z K,Randall C W.2003.The competition between PAO(phosphorus accumulating organisms)and GAO(glycogen accumulating organisms)in EBPR(enhanced biological phosphorus removal)systems at different temperatures and the effects on system performance[J].Water Science and Technology,47(11):1-8.
  • 5Filipe C D M,Daigger G T,Grady Jr C P L,et al.2001b.Effects of pH on the rates of aerobic metabolism of phosphate accumulating and glycogen-accumulating organisms[J].Water EnvironmentResearch,73(2):213-222.
  • 6Filipe C D M,Daigger G T,Grady Jr C P L.2001a.Stoichiometry and kinetics of acetate uptake under anaerobic conditions by an enriched culture of phosphorus-accumulating organisms at different pHs[J].Biotechnology and Bioengineering.76(1):32-43.
  • 7Fnkase T,Shibata M,Miyaji Y.1985.The role of an anaerobic stage on biological phosphorus removal[J].Water Science and Technology,17(1):68-80.
  • 8Grady Jr C P L,Filipe C D M,et al.2000.Ecological engineering of bioreactors for wastewater treatment[J].Water Air and Soil Pollution,123(1/4):117-132.
  • 9Griffiths P C.Stratton H M.Seviour R J.2002.Environmental factors contributing to the‘G bacteria'population in full-scale EBPR plants[J].Water Science and Technology,46(4-5),185-192.
  • 10Gujer W.Henze M,Mino T,et al.1995.Activated Sludge Model No.2:biological phosphorus removal[J].Water Science and Technology,31(2):1-11.

共引文献212

同被引文献21

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部