摘要
采用HS(1992)六位数出口数据,选择美国作为比较基准国,对金砖四国的结构转换能力与专业化模式变迁进行比较,实证检验了结构转换能力对专业化模式的影响。研究发现:与美国相比,金砖四国现有专业化模式层次相对较低,结构转换能力不够强;中印两国在专业化模式及演进上具有较多相似性;中国结构转换能力相对较强,其次是印度,而巴西和俄罗斯的结构转换能力不断下降;未来金砖四国在技术复杂度高的产品部门有较多潜在优势产品,但目前结构转换能力与转换空间不够一致。
By adopting HS (1992) six-digit export data and taking U.S.A as a benchmark country, this paper makes a comparison between the structure transformation capability and the evolution of spe- cialization patterns of BRIC countries, so as to empirically test the impact of the structure transformation capability on the specialization patterns. The result shows that, compared with the U.S.A, the existing levels of their specialization patterns are relatively lower and their structure transformation capabilities are relatively weaker. China and India have many similarities in the specialization patterns and the evolution process. China' s capability of structure transformation is relatively stronger, followed by India, but the capabilities of Brazil and Russia are declining. In the future, BRIC countries will have more "products with potential advantages" in the sectors with higher level of technical sophistication. At present, howev- er, their capabilities of structure transformation are not consistent with the transformation space.
出处
《当代财经》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第6期85-96,共12页
Contemporary Finance and Economics
基金
教育部高等学校博士学科点专项科研项目"我国制造业出口结构变迁影响出口不稳定性的机制及实证研究"(20130161110029)
湖南省自然科学基金项目"出口多样化的决定因素及其对地区经济发展的影响"(13JJ1011)
关键词
金砖四国
比较优势
结构转换
技术复杂度
潜在优势产品
BRIC
comparative advantage
structural transformation
technical sophistication
products with potential advantages