期刊文献+

会阴切开危险因素的Logistic回归分析 被引量:3

Logistic regression analysis on the risk factors of episiotomy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨引起会阴切开的危险因素,为严格控制会阴切开提供科学依据。方法:回顾性分析2013年在该院产科行阴道分娩的400例单胎产妇,其中会阴切开200例,非会阴切开200例,对可能引起会阴切开的因素进行单因素分析和Logistic回归分析。结果:单因素分析共筛选出8个与会阴切开有关的因素,肩难产和臀位助产与会阴切开无关;Logistic回归分析确定胎儿窘迫、耻骨弓低、会阴韧硬、巨大儿、早产、孕妇体重指数、高度近视及妊娠期高血压疾病为会阴切开的相关危险因素,其OR值分别为4.57、3.89、3.57、3.48、3.01、2.57、2.45和2.04。结论:严格把控会阴切开的指征,提倡自然分娩,最大程度维护产妇会阴的完整性。 Objective: To explore the risk factors of episiotomy, provide scientific basis for strictly controlling episiotomy. Methods: Four hundred pregnant women of singleton-gestation receiving vaginal delivery in Department of Obstetrics in the hospital in 2013 were analyzed, 200 pregnant women of them underwent episiotomy, and the other 200 pregnant women did not. The risk factors of episiotomy were analyzed by univariate analysis and Logistic regression analysis. Results: Eight relevant factors of episiotomy were screened out by univariate analysis, shoulder dystocia and assisted breech delivery were not correlated with episiotomy; Logistic regression analysis showed that fetal distress, low pubic arch, hard perineum, maerosomia, preterm birth, maternal body mass index (BMI), high myopia, and hypertensive disorder complicating pregnancy (HDCP) were risk factors of episiotomy, OR values were 4. 57, 3.89, 3.57, 3.48, 3. Ol, 2. 57, 2.45, and 2. 04, respectively. Conclusion: The indications of episiotomy should be controlled strictly and natural delivery is advocated to try best to maintain the integrity of maternal perineum.
出处 《中国妇幼保健》 CAS 2015年第17期2717-2719,共3页 Maternal and Child Health Care of China
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目〔81270718〕
关键词 会阴切开 危险因素 LOGISTIC回归分析 Episiotomy Risk factor Logistic regression analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献15

  • 1王炳顺,周利锋,高尔生,朱丽萍,高晓玲.产妇产后对分娩方式的再认识[J].中国妇幼保健,2006,21(20):2784-2787. 被引量:32
  • 2谷祖善 赵霞.应不应该做会阴切开.实用妇产科杂志,1993,:275-275.
  • 3Frankman EA, Wang L, Bunker CH, et al. Episiotomy in the United States : has anything changed ? [ J ]. Am J Obstet Gynecol,2009,200 (5) :573. e1 -e7.
  • 4Graham ID, Carroli G, Davies C, et al. Episiotomy rates around the world:an update[ J]. Birth ,2005,32(3 ) :219 - 223.
  • 5Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Management of third and fourth degree perineal tears following vaginal delivery [ M ]. Guide-line No 29. London :RCOG,2001:320 -321.
  • 6Nager CW, Helliwell JP. Episiotomy increases perineal laceration length in primiparous women [ J ]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2001,185 (2) :444 -450.
  • 7Bansal RK,Tan WM,Ecker JL,et al. Is there a benefit to episiotomy at spontaneous vaginal delivery? a natural experiment [ J ]. Am J Ob- stet Gynecol, 1996,175 (4) : 897 - 901.
  • 8Victoria LH, Joan L, Blomquigt, et al. Pelvic floor disorders after vagi- nal birth [ J ]. Obstet Gynecol, 2012,119 ( 2 Pt 1 ) : 233 - 239.
  • 9Werner CH, Schuler W, Meskendahl I. Midline episiotomy versus me- dio-lateral episiotomy:a randomized prospective study. Int J Gynecol Obstet Proceedings of 13th World Congress of Gynaecology and Ob- stetrics(FIGO) [J]. Singapore, 1991,1 ( 1 ) :33 -35.
  • 10Borgatta L,Piening SL, Cohen WR. Association of episiotomy and de- livery position with deep perineal laceration during spontaneous deliv- ery in nulliparous women [ J ]. Am J Obster Gyuecol, 1989,160 ( 2 ) : 294 - 297.

共引文献64

同被引文献22

引证文献3

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部