期刊文献+

不同化疗方案治疗晚期及进展期霍奇金淋巴瘤的临床分析 被引量:3

Clinical analysis of different chemotherapy regimens in the treatment of advanced stage Hodgkin's lymphoma
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨晚期及进展期霍奇金淋巴瘤患者采用不同化疗方案进行治疗的不良反应及临床疗效。方法选取2012年10月至2013年10月收治的46例晚期及进展期霍奇金淋巴瘤患者,依照随机分组方式分为观察组与对照组,每组23例,观察组采用BEACOPP化疗方案进行治疗,对照组采用ABVD化疗方案进行治疗,观察并比较两组患者的近期疗效、远期疗效与不良反应。结果观察组5年OS率为95.7%,对照组为73.9%,观察组5年总生存率明显高于对照组(P〈0.05),但两组不良反应发生率及5年无病生存率比较差异均未见统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论晚期及进展期霍奇金淋巴瘤患者采用BEACOPP化疗方案治疗的远期疗效较好,不同化疗方案临床治疗均为有效且不良反应相仿。 Objective To investigate the adverse reactions and clinical effect of different chemo- therapy regimens on advanced Hodgkin lymphoma patients. Methods Forty-six patients were selected as the research objects from October 2012 to October 2013. All of them were divided into observation group and control group, and each group had 23 cases. The patients in observation group were given BEACOPP chemotherapy for treatment. The patients of control group were given ABVD chemotherapy for treatment. The short-term, long-term efficacy and adverse reactions of the two groups were observed and compared. Results The 5 year OS rate was 95.7 % in the observation group, and was 73.9% in the control group. The 5 year overall survival rate of observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group (P 〈0. 05). But the observation group and the control group had no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions 5 year disease free survival rate ( P 〉 0. 05 ). Conclusions The long-term effect of BEACOPP regimen on advanced Hodgkin lymphoma is good, different chemotherapy regimens are effective and adverse reactions are similar.
作者 丁辉
出处 《中国实用医刊》 2015年第12期27-28,共2页 Chinese Journal of Practical Medicine
关键词 化疗方案 霍奇金淋巴瘤 疗效 Hodgkin's lymphoma Chemotherapy Curative effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献27

  • 1刘霆.霍奇金淋巴瘤的诊治进展[J].白血病.淋巴瘤,2008,17(1). 被引量:3
  • 2董颖,陈赛娟.淋巴瘤的流行病学[M]//沈志祥,朱雄增.恶性淋巴瘤.2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2011:25-26.
  • 3Carde P, Koscielny S, Franklin J, et al. Early response to chemotherapy: a surrogate for final outcome of Hodgkin's disease patients that should influence initial treatment length and intensity.'? Ann Oncol, 2002, 13 Suppl 1:86-91.
  • 4Schwartz CL. The management of Hodgkin disease in the young child. Curr Opin Pediatr, 2003, 15:10-16.
  • 5Cheson BD, Homing SJ, Coiffier B, et al. Report of an international workshop to standardize response criteria for non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. NCI Sponsored International Working Group. J Clin Oneol, 1999, 17:1244.
  • 6Spitz MR, Sider JG, Johnson CC, et al. Ethnic patterns of Hodgkin's disease incidence among children and adolescents in the United States, 1973-82. J Natl Cancer Inst, 1986, 76:235-239.
  • 7Nachman JB, Sposto R, Herzog P, et al. Randomized comparison of low-dose involved-field radiotherapy and no radiotherapy for children with Hodgkin's disease who achieve a complete response to chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol, 2002, 20:3765-3771.
  • 8Macfarlane GJ, Evstifeeva T, Boyle P, et al. International patterns in the occurrence of Hodgkin's disease in children and young adult males. Int J Cancer, 1995, 61:165-169.
  • 9Hjalgrim H, Smedby KE, Rostgaard K, et al. Infectious mononucleosis, childhood social environment, and risk of Hodgkin lymphoma. Cancer Res, 2007, 67:2382-2388.
  • 10Smith RS, Chen Q, Hudson MM, et al. Prognostic factors for children with Hodgkin's disease treated with combined-modality therapy. J Clin Oncol, 2003, 21:2026-2033.

共引文献15

同被引文献23

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部