董事会非正式层级、技术董事与技术创新绩效被引量：11

Board Informal Hierarchy,Technical Directors and Technological Innovation Performance

下载PDF

导出

摘要基于内部互动视角,将由于个人社会资源不同形成的董事间非正式关系定义为董事会非正式层级,探讨其隐性作用对董事会决策效率及创新绩效的影响。以153家创业板企业2011—2013年数据为样本,实证结果表明:董事会非正式层级清晰度与企业技术创新绩效呈显著的正相关关系。技术独立董事位于非正式最高层级能增强两者正向关系;而技术董事长位于非正式最高层级的负向调节作用不明显;董事会规模变大则会减弱两者正向关系。 Based on the perspective of boardroom interaction, this article defined the informal relationship which was due to different social network and personal resources as board informal hierarchy, and discussed the effects on the decision-making efficiency and innovation performance. By using sample data of 153 listed companies on GEM from 2011 to 2013, the empirical results showed that the clarity of board informal hierarchy was significantly and positively associated with technological innovation performance; and technical independent director in the informal highest-level could enhance the positive influence, while the technical chairman of informal highest-level did not show obvious negative influence on it; and the bigger board size would weaken the positive relationship.

作者曾江洪肖涛

机构地区中南大学商学院

出处《科技与经济》 2015年第3期1-5,19,共6页 Science & Technology and Economy

基金湖南省优秀社科研究基地专项资助项目--"中小企业高管团队非正式层级与战略决策关系研究"(项目编号:12JDZ35 项目负责人:曾江洪)成果之一

关键词董事会非正式层级技术董事技术创新绩效 board informal hierarchy technical directors technological innovation performance

分类号 F271 [经济管理—企业管理]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献16

1徐向艺,汤业国.董事会结构与技术创新绩效的关联性研究——来自中国中小上市公司的经验证据[J].经济与管理研究,2013,34(2):35-41. 被引量：24
2Finkelstein S, Mooney A. Not the usual suspects: How to use board process to make boards better[ J ]. Academy of Manage- ment Executive, 2003,17 (2) : 101-113.
3Carter C B, Lorsch J. Back to the Drawing Board: Designing Corporate Boards for a Complex World [ M ]. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2004.
4Westphal J D , Stem I. The other pathway to the boardroom: In- terpersonal influence behavior as a substitute for elite credentials and majority status in obtaining board appointments[ J ]. Admin- istrative Science Quarterly, 2006(51 ) : 169-204.
5Overbeck J R, Correll J, Park B. Internal Status Sorting in Groups: The Problem of Too Many Stars[J]. Research on Man- aging Groups & Teams, 2005(7) :169-199.
6Magee J C, Galinsky A D. Social Hierarchy : The Self-reinforeing Nature of Power and Status [ J ]. Academy of Management An- nals, 2008,2:351-398.
7Belliveau M A, O' Reilly C A, Wade J B. Social Capital at the Top : Effects of Social Similarity and Status on CEO Compensa- tion [ J ]. Academy of Management Journal, 1996 ( 39 ) : 1568-1593.
8Jinyu He, Zhi Huang. Board Informal Hierarchy and Firm Finan- cial Performance : Exploring a Tacit Structure Guiding Boardroom Interactions [ J ]. Academy of Management Journal, 2011 ( 2 ) : 1119-1139.
9Burgelman Robert. Strategic management of technology and inno- vation [ M ]. New York : McGraw-Hill, 1996.
10Guan J. Comparison study on industrial innovation between China and some European countries [ J ]. Production and Inventory Management Journal,2002,43(4) : 30-46.