期刊文献+

基于性能目标的一种核电站抗震设计方法研究 被引量:2

Research on performance objective-based seismic design method of nuclear power plant
下载PDF
导出
摘要 核电站在设计基准期因地震可能引起的破坏与核电站抗震性能设计水准的高低有直接的关系。美国土木工程协会(ASCE)根据美国能源部门对电站在自然灾害下的设计理论做进一步的研究,提出了ASCE 43-05规范的设计方法。该方法运用了成熟的概率地震危险性分析和地震易损性分析基本原理,提出了基于性能目标的设计方法。由于我国还缺少这方面的研究,故系统推导了该方法,并给出了参数变化时该方法的两个性能目标达到的程度。另外,评估核电站结构、系统和组件(SSC)的高置信低失效(HCLPF)是目前评估核电站的主要指标,研究了ASCE 43-05规范设计方法的HCLPF值,得出了该方法在不同条件下满足性能目标的要求,和具备高置信低失效的要求。最后,进行了算例验证和计算分析,为今后我国核电站的设计提供技术参考。 There is a direct relationship between the damage of nuclear power plants due to an earthquake in design reference period and the level of plant design standards. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) proposed ASCE 43 -05 standardized design method, which based on the further research of U. S. Department of Energy on plant design theory in natural disasters. The method used the basic and general principle of ripe probabilistic seis- mic hazard analysis and seismic vulnerability analysis, and derived the design method based on performance goals. Because of lack of research in this field, this paper deduced and described the two performance parameters of the method to achieve the performance goals. In addition, assessment of high confidence low probability failare (HCLPF) of nuclear power plant structures, systems and components (SSC) is a main method for nuclear power plants. This paper studies HCLPF value of the ASCE 43 -05 standard design method and draws a conclusion that the method meets performance requirements in different conditions, and has a high confidence low probability fail- ure requirement. Finally, an example analysis provides a technical reference for the future design of nuclear power plant in China.
出处 《世界地震工程》 CSCD 北大核心 2015年第2期148-155,共8页 World Earthquake Engineering
基金 国家国际科技合作专项项目(2012DFA70810) 地震行业科研专项经费项目(201208013)
关键词 核电站 抗震设计 性能目标 风险降低比值 高置信低失效 nuclear power plants seismic design performance objective risk reduction ratio high confidence lowprobability failure (HCLPF)
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1李志国,潘华,李金臣,徐伟进.累积绝对速度在核电厂地震危险性分析中的应用研究[J].地震学报,2010,32(1):69-76. 被引量:7
  • 2Robert C. Kennedy,Stephen A. Short. BASIS FOR SEISMIC PROVISIONS OF OE - STD - 1020[ Z]. U. S. Department of Energy Washington, D. C ,April 1994.
  • 3ASCE. Seismic Design Criteria for Structures , Systems, and Components in Nuclear Facilities [ S ]. ASCE/SEI 43 - 05,2005.
  • 4Prassinos PG, Ravindra MK, Savy JD. Recommendations to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission on Trial Guide lines for Seismic Margin Reviews of Nuclear Power Plants [ S ]. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, NUREG/CR - 4482,1986.
  • 5EPRI. A Methodology for Assessment of Nuclear Power Plant Seismic Margin [ Z ]. EPRINP - 6041, EPRI, Palo Alto, California, 1988.
  • 6U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Reactor Safety Study[ R]. WASH - 1400, NUREG 73/041, 1975.
  • 7American Nuclear Society standards committee Working Group ANS - 2,26. categorization of nuclear facility structures, systems, and components for seismic design [ S ]. ANSI/ANS - 2,26,2004.
  • 8American Nuclear Society standards committee Working Group ANS - 2,27. categorization of nuclear facility structures, systems, and components for seismic design[ S]. ANSI/ANS -2,26,2008.
  • 9American Nuclear Society standards committee Working Group ANS - 2,29. categorization of nuclear facility structures, systems, and components for seismic design[ S]. ANSI/ANS - 2,26,2008.
  • 10EPRI. Methodology for Developing Seismic Fragilities . EPRI TR - 103959, EPRI, Palo Alto, California, 1994.

二级参考文献9

  • 1陈培善,陈海通.由二维破裂模式导出的地震定标律[J].地震学报,1989,11(4):337-350. 被引量:21
  • 2中国地震局地球物理研究所.2005.广东阳江核电站厂址地震安全性评价报告[R].北京:中国地震局地球物理研究所:128-141.
  • 3Bolt B A. 1973. Duration of strong ground motion[C]//Proc Fifth World Conf Earth Eng: 1304-1307.
  • 4Electric Power Research Institute. 1988. A Criterion for Determining Exceedance of the Operating Basis Earthquake[R] //EPRI Report NP-5930: 1-28.
  • 5Electric Power Research Corporation. 1991. Standardization of the Cumulative Absolute Velocity[R]//EPRIReport TR- 100082: 1-20.
  • 6EPRI, Palo Alto, the US Department of Energy. 2006. Program on Technology Innovation: Use of Cumulative Absolute Velocity (CAV) in Determining Effects of Small Magnitude Earthquakes on Seismic Hazard Analyses[R]//EPRI Report TR-1014099: 1-40.
  • 7Hanks T C, Kanamori H. 1979. A moment magnitude scale[J]. J Geophys Res, 84(B5): 2348-2350.
  • 8戚承志,钱七虎.核电站抗震研究综述[J].地震工程与工程振动,2000,20(3):76-86. 被引量:28
  • 9陈培善,白彤霞.震源参数之间的定量关系[J].地震学报,1991,13(4):401-411. 被引量:62

共引文献6

同被引文献50

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部