期刊文献+

简短戒烟干预研究的Meta分析 被引量:14

Minimal-Intervention on smoking cessation: a Meta-analysis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 采用Meta分析评价简短戒烟干预的有效性.方法 计算机检索2000年1月至2014年9月中外生物医学数据库(The Cochrane Library、Medline、EMbase、中文期刊全文数据库、万方电子期刊数据库、维普中文科技期刊数据库和中国生物医学文献数据库)中有关简短戒烟干预随机对照试验,采用Revman 5.1软件进行Meta分析.结果 最终纳入9篇文献,随机效应模型合并RR值(95%CI)=1.57(1.01 - 2.44).与未进行干预的吸烟者相比,接受了简短戒烟干预的吸烟者,其戒烟的可能性提高了57%.研究对象为孕妇和就诊患者,干预时间≤10 min的亚组更易戒烟,但各亚组分析结果之间的差异均无统计学意义.结论 简短戒烟干预可提高戒烟率,但该结论尚需纳入更多高质量大样本的随机对照试验加以证实。 Objective To systematically evaluate the effectiveness of Minimal Smoking Cessation Intervention Program (MSCIP) and to provide theoretical basis for the feasibility of implementation in China.Methods Systematically,we searched data from studies published between January,2000 and September,2014 on the database that including Cochrane Library,Medline,EMbase,CNKI,Wanfang,Vip,etc.Studies related to MSCIP were designed by random controlled trials.Meta analysis was performed by Revman 5.1.Results Nine studies were included,with the Random-Effect Model Relative Risk as 1.57 (1.01-2.44),which indicated that the probability of being tobacco abstinent had increased by 57% in the treating group than in the control group.Participants who developed other diseases,being pregnant or the time of receiving intervention messages ≤ 10 minutes,were more likely to quit the program.There were no significant statistically differences noticed between the different subgroups.Conclusion Minimal smoking cessation intervention increased cessation rates,RCTs with a larger sample size are needed to draw the related conclusions.
出处 《中华流行病学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第6期658-662,共5页 Chinese Journal of Epidemiology
基金 国家自然科学基金(81373080) 北京市科委项目(Z121107001012070) 解放军总医院基金(2013FC-TSYS-1021,MJ201447)
关键词 戒烟 简短干预 META分析 Smoking cessation Minimal-intervention Meta-analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1卫生部心血管病防治研究中心.中国心血管病报告2013[M].北京:中国大百科全书出版社,2014.
  • 2Peto R, Darby S, Deo H, et al. Smoking, smoking cessation, and lung cancer in the UK since 1950: combination of national statistics with two case-control studies[J], BMJ ,2000,321: 323-329.
  • 3US Department of Health and Human Services. The health benefits of smoking cessation[M]. United States: Public Health Service, Office on Smoking and Health, 1990.
  • 4Lam TH, Abdullah AS, Chan SS, et al. Adherence to nicotine replacement therapy versus quitting smoking among Chinese smokers: a preliminary investigation[J]. Psychopharmacology (Berl) ,2005,177(4) :400-408.
  • 5Han YW, Mohammad M, Liew SM. Effectiveness of a brief physician counselling session on improving smoking behaviour in the Workplace[J]. Asian PacJ Cancer Prev , 2014, 15 ( 17) : 7287-7290.
  • 6Lin PR, Zhao ZW, Cheng KK, et al. The effect of physician's 30 s smoking cessation intervention for male medical outpatients: a pilot randomized controlled trial[J].J Public Health, 2013,35 (3) : 375-383.
  • 7Stead LF, Buitrago D, Preciado N, et al. Physician advice for smoking cessation[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2013 (5) , doi: 10.1002/1465 I 858.CDOOOI65.pub4.
  • 8Moher D,Jadad AR, Nichol G, et al. Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: an annotated bibliography of scales and checklists[J]. Control Clin Trials, 1995,16(1): 62-73.
  • 9詹思延.如何做一个好的系统综述和Meta分析[J].北京大学学报(医学版),2010,42(6):644-647. 被引量:29
  • 10武珊珊,张越伦,王巍巍,陈茹,孙凤,詹思延.耐多药结核病治疗过程中肝损害发生率的Meta分析[J].北京大学学报(医学版),2014,46(3):417-423. 被引量:9

二级参考文献67

共引文献285

同被引文献121

引证文献14

二级引证文献59

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部