我国犯罪论体系下客观归责理论的引入

The Introduction of Objective Culpability in China Criminology System

犯罪论体系的差异使得客观归责论的整体借鉴存在障碍,但并不影响将该理论蕴含的具体、明确的实质判断标准融入我国现有的犯罪论体系之中。制造法不容许的危险可以作为判断社会危害性的下位规则,以对行为要素进行积极和消极的双向判断,并为危害行为和正当行为提供具体的判断标准;风险实现原理能够对因果理论加以改造,通过行为产生的具体风险与结果的直观比对判断因果关系,从而将价值判断限定在行为认定阶段,又将行为的价值因素即法不容许的风险在因果关系中加以反映,既维护了刑法因果关系的客观性,又保留了刑法因果关系的价值性。

Because of difference between China criminology system and Germany criminology system, we can＇t introduce the objective culpability theory without reservation. But it do not affect the introduction of specific, clear substantive standards contain in the objective culpability theory. Providing illegal risks can be used to judge the social harmfulness, which can do positive and nega- tive judgment to behavior, can provide specific criteria for the perpetrating act and reasonable act. Realizing risk principle can transform causal theory. We can judge cause and effect through compa- ring the specific risk of constitutive behavior with the result directly. Thus, value judgment is de-fined on the behavior recognition stage, while the value factor of behavior to be reflected in the causality. This method not only can maintain the objectivity of causality, but also preserve the value of the criminal law＇s causality.