期刊文献+

潜艇艇员群体认同问卷的编制 被引量:1

Development of Submariners' Group Identification Questionnaire
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:编制"潜艇艇员群体认同问卷",以为评估潜艇艇员群体认同提供借鉴工具。方法:以482名潜艇艇员为被试,通过相关分析、结构方程建模等统计分析和编程方法,对"潜艇艇员群体认同问卷"的质量各指标进行了分析。结果:问卷的项目通俗性在0.573~0.707之间,平均值为0.662,标准差为0.042;项目区分度在0.398~0.764之间,平均值为0.643,标准差为0.083;问卷Cronbach's信度系数为0.963,Spearman-Brown分半信度r=0.942,重测信度r=0.853;校标效度r=0.732,结构效度各拟合指数为χ2=1300.71,df=660,χ2/df=1.97,CFI=0.98,NNFI=0.98,RMSEA=0.058。结论:潜艇艇员群体认同在结构上是由身份性、同质性、自评、他评、积极情绪、依恋6个因子构成的二阶模型;自编"潜艇艇员群体认同问卷"具有较好的信度、效度、区分度和通俗性水平,可以作为测量潜艇艇员群体认同的工具。 Objective: To develop the submariners' group identification questionnaire so as to provide a tool used for referenceto measure submariners ' group identification. Methods: Totally 482 submariners were investigated by using the submariners' group identification questionnaire,and quality indices of the questionnaire wereanalyzedby using methods such as correlation analysis and structural equation modeling. Results: Quality parameters of the questionnaire were as follows: Item popularity level was between0. 573 ~ 0. 707,with Mean of 0. 662 and Standard Deviation of 0. 042; Item discrimination was between0. 398 ~ 0. 764,with mean of 0. 643 and standard deviation of 0. 083; Cronbach 's Alpha reliability was0. 963. Spearman- Brownsplit- half reliability was 0. 942. Test- retest reliability was 0. 853; Criterion-related validity was 0. 732. Fit indices of structural validity were as follows: χ2= 1300. 71,df = 660,χ2/ df= 1. 97,CFI = 0. 98,NNFI = 0. 98,RMSEA = 0. 058. Conclusion: Submariners' group identification is a2- step model which consist of 6 factors,which respectively areidentity,similarity,self- assessment,other- assessment,positive emotion,and attachment; Self- developed submariners' group identification questionnaire has a good reliability,validity,item discrimination,and item popularity level,and it can be used as a tool of measuring submariners' group identification.
出处 《中国健康心理学杂志》 2015年第6期924-928,共5页 China Journal of Health Psychology
基金 海军医学研究所科研基金(编号:12HYB2)
关键词 认同问卷 群体认同 潜艇艇员 心理评估 Identification Group identification Submariners
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Tajfel H.Social categorization[M].In S.Moscovici(Ed.),Introduction the Psychology Social,1st Edition,Paris:Larousse,1972:272-302.
  • 2Hatch M J,Schultz M.Relations between organizational culture,identity and image[J].European Journal of Marketing,1997,31(5):356-365.
  • 3Herring S.Interaction coherence in CMC[J].Journal of ComputerMediated Communication,1999,4(4),Online journal.Available at http://onlineliabrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1999.th00106.x/full.
  • 4Kramer R M.and Brewer M B.Effects of group identity on resource use in a simulated commons dilemma[J].Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1984,46:1044-1055.
  • 5De Sanctis G.Communication processes for virtual organizations[J].Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication,1988,3(4):8-34.
  • 6James G.Reserve Identities:What are they?and do they matter?an empirical examination[J].Armed Forces Society,2011,37(4):619-635.
  • 7James G.Contradictory and complementary identities of U S army reservists:A historical perspective[J].Armed Forces&Society,2011,37(2):261-283.
  • 8Silva J M.A new generation of women?how female ROTC cadets negotiate the tension between masculine military culture and traditional femininity[J].Social Forces,2008,87(2):937-960.
  • 9Snider DM.Officership:The professional practice[J].Military Review,2003,83(1):3-8.
  • 10费穗宇.社会心理学词典[M].石家庄:河北人民出版社.1988:45.

共引文献10

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部