期刊文献+

水环境中有机紫外防晒剂的生态风险评价 被引量:10

Ecological risk assessment of organic UV filters in aquatic environment
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价水环境中有机紫外防晒剂残留的生态风险。方法查阅2001—2014年文献获取有机紫外防晒剂的环境浓度及其对水生生物的毒性数据,采用评价因子法推导预测无效应浓度(PNEC)值,随后利用风险商(RQ)法评价各有机紫外防晒剂的生态风险。结果二苯酮-3(BP-3)对藻类的最大RQ>10,对鱼类也存在高风险(最大RQ>1);对甲氧基肉桂酸异辛酯(EHMC)对藻类、大型蚤、虾类和鱼类的最大RQ均大于1;3-(4-甲基苯亚甲基)-樟脑(4-MBC)对藻类和虾类表现出高风险;而辛基二甲基对氨基苯甲酸(OD-PABA)仅对藻类存在高风险;二苯酮-4(BP-4)的生态风险较低(RQ<0.1)。结论有机紫外防晒剂BP-3、EHMC、4-MBC和OD-PABA在实测环境浓度水平对水生生态系统存在潜在风险。 Objective To assess the ecological risk of organic UV filters in aquatic environment. Methods The concentrations of UV filters in aquatic environment and their toxicity data were acquired from the research papers during 2001-2014. The predicted no effect concentrations(PNEC) were calculated with the assessment factor method. Subsequently,the ecological risk assessment of the organic UV filters was conducted with the risk quotient(RQ). Results The maximum RQ of benzophenone-3(BP-3) was over 10 for algae,and it also exhibited high risk for fish(the maximum RQ〉1). The maximum RQ values of 2-ethylhexyl-4-methoxycinnamate(EHMC) for algae,daphnia,shrimp and fish were all over 1. 4-Methybenzylidene camphor(4-MBC) revealed high risk for algae and shrimp,and octyl-dimethyl-p-aminobenzoic acid(OD-PABA) only for algae. The ecological risk of benzophenone-4(BP-4) was lower(RQ〈0.1). Conclusion Organic UV filters BP-3,EHMC,4-MBC and OD-PABA may present a potential ecological risk for aquatic ecosystems with the environmental levels reported in the studies.
出处 《环境与健康杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2015年第4期332-336,共5页 Journal of Environment and Health
基金 国家自然科学基金(21277092) 国家科技部重大科学研究计划(973计划)项目(2014CB943300) 上海市教育委员会科研创新重点项目(12ZZ027)
关键词 有机紫外防晒剂 生态风险评价 预测无效应浓度 实测环境浓度 风险商 Organic UV filter Ecological risk assessment Predicted no effect concentration Measured environmental concentration Risk quotient
  • 相关文献

参考文献33

  • 1Rodil R, Moeder M. Development of a method for the determination of UV filters in water samples using stir bar sorptive extraction and thermal desorption-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry [J]. J Chromatogr A, 2008,1179:81-88.
  • 2Danovaro R, Bongiorni L, Corinaldesi C ,et al. Sunscreens cause coral bleaching by promoting viral infections [J]. Environ Health Perspect, 2008,116:441-447.
  • 3Schlumpf M,Cotton B,Conscience M,et al. In vitro and in vivo estrogenicity of UV screens [ J ]. Environ Health Perspect, 2001,109: 239-244.
  • 4Gago-Ferrero P, Diaz -Cruz MS,Barcelo D. An overview of UV- absorbing compounds (organic UV filters) in aquatic biota [J]. Anal Bioanal Chem, 2012,404:2597-2610.
  • 5Coronado M,De Haro H,Deng X,et al. Estrogenic activity and reproductive effects of the UV-filter oxybenzone (2-hydroxy-4- methoxyphenyl-methanone) in fish [ J ]. Aquat Toxicol, 2008,90: 182-187.
  • 6Bluthgen N, Zucchi S, Fent K. Effects of the UV filter benzophenone- 3 (oxybenzone) at low concentrations in zebrafish (Danio rerio) [J]. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol,2012,263: 184-194.
  • 7Zucchi S,Bluthgen N,Ieronimo A,et al. The UV-absorber benzophenone-4 alters transcripts of genes involved in hormonal pathways in zebrafish (Danio rerio) eleuthero-embryos and adult males [J]. Toxicol Appl Pharm,2011,250: 137-146.
  • 8Zucchi S, Oggier DM, Fent K. Global gene expression profile induced by the UV-fiher 2-ethyl-hexyl-4-trimethoxycinnamate (EHMC) in zebrafish (Danio rerio) [ J ]. Environ Pollut, 2011,159: 3086-3096.
  • 9Sieratowicz A, Kaiser D, Behr M, et al. Acute and chronic toxicity of four frequently used UV filter substances for Desmodesmus subspicatus and Daphnia magna [J]. J Environ Sci Health A,201 1,46: 1311-1319.
  • 10Rodil R,Moeder M,Altenburger R,et aL Photostability and phytotoxicity of selected sunscreen agents and their degradation mixtures in water [J]. Anal Bioanal Chem,2009,395: 1513-1524.

二级参考文献78

  • 1中华人民共和国卫生部.化妆品卫生规范[S].北京:中国卫生出版社,2007.
  • 2Caldwell D J, Mastrocco F, Nowak E, et al.An assessment ofpotential exposure and risk from estrogens in drinking water [ J].Environmental Health Perspectives, 2010, 118(3):338-344.
  • 3Hayashi T I,Kashiwagi N.A Bayesian approach to probabilisticecological risk assessment:risk comparison of nine toxicsubstances in Tokyo surface waters [ J].Environmental Scienceand Pollution Research, 2011, 18(3 ):365-375.
  • 4Straub J 0, Gysel D,Kastl U, et al.Environmental riskassessment for ancillary substances in biotechnological productionof pharmaceuticals [ J].Environmental Toxicology andChemistry, 2012, 31(3):681-687.
  • 5Mochida K, Amano H, Ito K, et al.Species sensitivitydistribution approach to primary risk analysis of the metalpyrithione photodegradation product, 2,2,-dipyridyldisulfide inthe Inland Sea and induction of notochord undulation in fishembryos [ J].Aquatic Toxicology, 2012,118-119:152-163.
  • 6Hoke R A, Bouchelle L D,Ferrell B D, ef al.Comparativeacute freshwater hazard assessment and preliminary PNECdevelopment for eight fluorinated aqids [ J].Chemosphere,2012,87(7):725-733.
  • 7Jin X W,Zha J M, Xu Y P, et al.Derivation of predicted noeffect concentrations(PNEC) for 2 , 4,6-trichlorophenol basedon Chinese resident species[ J].Chemosphere,2012,86(1 ):17-23.
  • 8Jin X W, Zha J M, Xu Y P, et al.Derivation of aquaticpredicted no-effect concentration(PNEC ) for 2, 4-dichlorophenol:Comparing native species data with non-nativespecies data[ J].Chemosphere, 2011,84(10):1506-1511.
  • 9De Laender F, De Schamphelaere K A C , Vanrolleghem P A, eial.Comparing ecotoxicological effect concentrations of chemicalsestablished in multi-species vs.single-species toxicity testsystems[ J].Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2009,72¢2):310-315.
  • 10Sadiq R , Husain T, Bose N , et al.Distribution of heavy metalsin sediment pore water due to offshore discharges:an ecologicalrisk assessment[ J].Environmental Modelling & Software,2003,18(5):451-461.

共引文献20

同被引文献96

引证文献10

二级引证文献46

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部