期刊文献+

外语教学研究方法的正本清源——论定性研究的回归

A Thorough Evaluation of the Research Methods in Foreign Language Teaching:A Return of the Qualitative Research
下载PDF
导出
摘要 外语教学研究方法受到了人们的普遍关注,定性和定量的范式之争一直以来备受争议,最后虽在混合法上得到缓和,但是方法上的不平衡性却依然显现。随着科学技术的快速发展,定量研究得到了快速发展,许多领域对数字的笃信,使得研究过程变得越来越技术化,研究者似乎成了操控这些技术的专业技术人员,定量研究俨然被看成是科学研究的唯一模式,而作为传统的定性研究方法正被人们所忽视。文章重拾这一话题并非是要搞方法的发明和创新,而是要找回外语教学研究方法的本质和主体性,找回研究的理性,让定性研究得于回归。 An increasing attention has been paid to the research methods of foreign language teaching and the debate over the quantitative methods or the qualitative ones has long been controversial. Although the debate has been finally compromised through the hybrid method, there still remain visibly unbalanced methods. With the rapid development of science and technology, quantitative research methods have been so widely and reliably used in the study of many disciplines that the research process has become more and more technical. Researchers seem to have become technicians deploying technologies in their study, and the quantitative research method has been deemed as the only scientific research mode. Consequently, the traditional qualitative research methods are ignored. Aimed again at the same topic, this paper does not intend to invent or innovate any research methods, but attempts to re-explore the essence and the subjectivity of the research methods in foreign language teaching, the rationality of the study, and the eventual return of the qualitative research.
作者 王坤邦
出处 《临沧师范高等专科学校学报》 2015年第1期98-101,105,共5页 Journal of Lincang Education College
关键词 外语教学 定性研究 传统 主体性 回归 foreign language teaching qualitative research tradition subjectivity return
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献26

  • 1高一虹,李莉春,吕王君.中、西应用语言学研究方法发展趋势[J].外语教学与研究,1999,31(2):8-16. 被引量:300
  • 2许国璋.论语言[M].北京:外语教学与研究出版社,1991..
  • 3Benson, P. , A. Chik, X. Gao, J. Huang & W. Wang. 2009. Qualita- tive research in language teaching and learning journals [ J ]. The Modern Language Journal,93 (1) :79 -90.
  • 4Bryman, A. 2004. Social Research Methods (2nd edition. ) [ M ]. Ox-ford : Oxford University Press.
  • 5Cohen, L. , L. Manion & K. Morrison. 2007. Research Methods in Edu- cation ( 6th edition. ) [ M ]. London : Routledge.
  • 6Creswell, J. 1998. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions [ M ]. Thousand Oaks : SAGE.
  • 7Lazaraton,A. 1995. Qualitative research in applied linguistics:A pro- gress report[ J]. TESOL Quarterly,29(3 ) :455 -472.
  • 8Lazaraton, A. 2002. A Qualitative Approach to the Validation of Oral Language Tests [ M ]. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
  • 9Lazaraton, A. 2003. Evaluative criteria for qualitative research in ap- plied linguistics:whose criteria and whose research? [ J ]. The Modern Language Journal ,87 ( 1 ) : 1 - 12.
  • 10Lazaraton, A. 2005. Quantitative research methods [ A ]. In E. Hinkel ( ed. ). Handbook of Research in Second Language Learning [ C ]. Wahwah : Erlbaum.

共引文献422

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部