小针刀与传统手术治疗肛裂的疗效对比分析

Small needle knife with traditional surgery cure rural comparative analysis for the treatment of anal fissure

目的探讨小针刀与传统手术治疗肛裂的疗效的比较。方法该院对2012年5月—2014年5月收治的140例肛裂患者进行回顾性分析,随机分成实验组和对照组各70例,实验组采用小针刀手术治疗,对照组采用传统手术进行治疗,手术后观察两组患者的治疗效果。结果两组患者通过治疗,实验组的治愈率明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);实验组在手术时间、术后并发症、伤口愈合时间方面明显短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组患者的复发率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论采用小针刀的手术在治疗效果方面优于传统手术,小针刀的手术的特有的优势被用于治疗肛裂,具有重要的临床意义,值得推广应用。

Objective To study the curative effect of small needle knife and conventional surgery for the treatment of anal fissure. Methods Retrospectively analyzed 140 cases of patients treated with anal fissure in our hospital from May 2012 to May 2014, ran-domly divided into experimental group and control group （n=70）, experimental group with small needle knife surgery treatment, the control group with traditional surgery treatment, observe the therapeutic effect of two groups of patients after surgery. Results After treatment, the experimental group cure rate were significantly higher than those of control group , statistically significant （ P〈0.05）;The experimental group in operation time, postoperative complications, wound healing time significantly shorter than that in control group, statistically significant （P〈0.05）; The recurrence rate was no significant difference of two groups, no statistical significance （P〉0.05）. Conclusion With small needle knife surgery in the treatment effect was better than traditional surgeries, the unique ad-vantage of small needle knife surgery was used in the treatment of anal fissure, had important clinical significance, worth of popu-larization and application.