髓内钉InterTan与重建钉治疗股骨近端骨折的临床疗效

InterTan Clinical Efficacy and Reconstruction Intramedullary Nail Nail Treatment of Proximal Femoral Fractures

目的探究髓内钉InterTan与重建钉治疗股骨近端骨折的疗效。方法资料随机选取2013年6月—2014年6月该院收治的135例股骨近端骨折患者,随机分为研究组68例,对照组67例。对照组行股骨近端重建钉治疗,研究组行髓内钉InterTan治疗,分析两组治疗效果。结果研究组术中出血量(228.65±28.42)mL、住院时间(16.53±5.68)d及完全负重时间(6.75±1.49)d均优于对照组的(325.57±54.28)mL、(23.62±7.26)d与(10.82±1.93)d,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后研究组髋关节Harris评分(93.63±4.45)分高于对照组(80.24±4.88)分,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 髓内钉InterTan较之股骨近端重建钉治疗疗效确切,可显著改善股骨近端骨折患者髋关节功能。

Objective To explore interTan nail nail treatment and reconstruction of the proximal femur fractures. Methods Data were randomly selected in June 2013-2014 June our hospital 135 cases of proximal femoral fractures were randomly divided into study group of 68 patients in the control group of 67 cases. The control group underwent proximal femoral reconstruction nail treatment, nail InterTan study group underwent treatment, analyze the effect of the two groups. Results Blood loss study group （228.65±28.42） mL,length of hospital stay（16.53±5.68）d and full load time （6.75±1.49）d are better than the control group（325.57± 54.28）days、（23.62±7.26）d and（10.82±1.93）d, the difference was statistically significant （P〈0.05）; postoperative Research Group Harris hip score （93.63 ±4.45） higher, the difference was statistically significant （P〈0.05）. Conclusion InterTan than proximal femoral nail reconstruction nail treatment efficacy, can significantly improve the function of the proximal femur hip fracture pa-tients.