摘要
目的分析对比波立维和泰嘉治疗冠心病的临床疗效及经济学差异。方法选取2013年3月—2014年5月期间该院收治的冠心病患者80例,随机分为波立维组及泰嘉组。对比分析两组患者的临床疗效、不良反应以及患者的治疗费用。结果在随访1年内,两组患者的临床有效率及不良反应发生情况差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);泰嘉组的治疗费用明显低于波立维组,两组差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论临床运用波立维及泰嘉治疗冠心病在临床疗效、不良反应基本无区别,但泰嘉的治疗费用明显低于波立维。所以可以用泰嘉代替波立维代替治疗冠心病。
Objective To analyzed wave set peacekeeping tai jia difference in economics and the clinical curative effect of treatment of coronary heart disease (CHD).Methods Between March 2013 and May 2013 in our department to take the 80 cases of patients with coronary heart disease, were randomly divided into wave d and tai jia group. Comparative analysis of two groups of patients with clinical efficacy, adverse reactions, and the patient’s treatment.Results In the follow-up of 1 year, two groups of patients with the clinical effectiveness and adverse reactions occur differences had no statistical significance (P〉 0.05); But the costs of treating tai jia group was obviously lower wavelengths, d group, the differences between the two groups have statistical significance (P〈 0.05).Conclusion The clinical use of wave vertical dimension and tai jia on the treatment of coronary heart disease in clinical efficacy, So you can use tai jia for wave vertical dimension for treatment of coronary heart disease.
出处
《中外医疗》
2015年第9期133-134,共2页
China & Foreign Medical Treatment
关键词
波立维
泰嘉
冠心病
临床疗效
Wave d
Tai jia
Coronary heart disease
Clinical curative effect