期刊文献+

霍兰德理论视域下学生投入对不同学科学习成果的影响 被引量:5

Effects of Student Engagement on the Relationship between Academic Disciplines and Learning Outcomes from the Perspective of Holland's Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文借鉴霍兰德理论框架,采用结构方程模型,基于中山大学2014年度学生学习状况调查数据,分析学生所就读的学科、投入状况与学习成果之间的关系,重点探究学生投入作为学科和学习成果之间的中介作用。分析发现,学生所就读学科与学习成果之间存在复杂的关系,且因不同的学生投入表现而不同。其中,学生所就读学科与其投入状况及学习成果显著直接相关,学生投入与学习成果显著直接正相关,部分学科通过学生投入与学习成果间接相关:文科和工科通过学生投入与社会人文思辨能力、基本理科能力和自我发展能力等学习成果分别呈显著间接正相关和显著间接负相关,社科与社会人文思辨能力通过学生投入显著间接正相关,学生投入在理科和医科与学习成果之间起到了一定的显著中介作用。研究结果表明,本科人才培养应针对不同学科特点制定各具特色、融合发展的人才培养方案和策略,最大限度地提高学生投入和学习成果。 The research investigated the relationships among students' academic disciplines, levels of engagement, and learning outcomes from the perspective of Holland' s person-environment theory. The study focused on the role of student engagement as a mediator in the relationships between academic disciplines and learning outcomes. From the structural equation modeling and analysis of the data of 3,507 seniors who participated in the 2014 Student Survey of Higher Learning in Sun Yat-Sen University, results revealed that students' academic disciplines were significantly related to levels of engagement and learning outcomes. Student engagement was also significantly related to learning outcomes. In addition, some academic disciplines were indirectly related to learning outcomes through levels of engagement, which is statistically significant, positively and negatively respectively for the students in the liberal arts and engineering disciplines, and partially held true for the students in the social science, science and medical disciplines. The results would be helpful to deepen our understanding of the college student learning and college outcomes, providing important reference for the institutions which focus on the student-centered and learning centered cultivation programs.
出处 《大学教育科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第3期118-124,共7页 University Education Science
基金 全国教育科学规划教育部重点课题“高等教育学生投入影响因素及作用路径:模型与实证研究”(DIA140298)
关键词 学生投入 学习成果 间接影响 霍兰德理论 student engagement learning outcome, indirect effect Holland' s Theory
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Smart,J.C,.Differential Patterns of Change and Stability in Student Learning Outcomes in Holland's Academic Environments:The Role of Environmental Consistency[J].Research in Higher Education, 2010,51(5) :468-482.
  • 2Weidman.Undergraduate socialization:A conceptual approach,in Higher education:Handbook of theory and research[M]. J. C.Smart,Editor. New York: Agathon. 1989,289-323.
  • 3Holland,J.L..Making vocational choices:A theory of vocational personalities and work environment(3rd ed.) [M] . Odessa , FL .. Psychological Assessment Resources. 1997.
  • 4Pike,G.R..Vocational preferences and college expectations An extension of Holland' s principle of self-selection[J].Research in Higher Education, 2006,47: 591-612.
  • 5Feldman, K. A., Smart, J. C., Ethington, C. A.. Using Holland' s theory to study patterns of college student success:The impact of major fields on students,in Higher education:Handbook of theory and research[M]. J. C. Smart, Editor. Dordrecht: Spring er. 2008,329-380.
  • 6Pike, G. R.. Students' personality types, intended majors,and college expectations:Further evidence concerning psychological and sociological interpretations of Holland's theory[J].Research in Higher Education, 2006,47: 801-822.
  • 7Smart, J. C. , Umbach,P. D.. Faculty and academic environments:Using Holland's theory to explore differences in how faculty structure undergraduate courses[J]. Journal of College Student Development, 2007,48:183-195.
  • 8Astin, A. W.. Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education[J]. Journal of College Student Development, 1999,40:518-529.
  • 9Tinto,V..Dropout from higher educationA theoretical synthesis of recent research[J].Review of educational research, 1975,45(1) 89-125.
  • 10Pascarella, E.T.. College environmental influences on learning and cognitive development.A criticalreview and synthesis,in Higher education:Handbook of theory and research[M]. J. C. Smart,Editor.New York: Agathon. 1985,1-64.

二级参考文献121

  • 1周作宇,周廷勇.大学生就读经验:评价高等教育质量的一个新视角[J].大学(研究),2007(1):27-31. 被引量:74
  • 2潘懋元.《学习风格与大学生自主学习》书评[J].西安交通大学学报(社会科学版),2004,24(4):95-96. 被引量:46
  • 3鲍威.扩招后中国高校学生的学习行为特征分析[A].2008年中国教育经济学年会会议论文集[C].2008.
  • 4陆根书,程光旭,杨兆芳.大学课堂学习环境论[M].西安:西安交通大学出版社,2010.
  • 5吴明隆.结构方程模型-AMOS的操作与运用[M].重庆:重庆人民出版社,2009.38-270.
  • 6Ewell, P.T. "A Emerging Scholarship: A Brief History of Assessment, "In T. W. Banta & Associates (Ed) , Building A Scholarship of Assessment (San Francisco: Jossey- Bass, 2002).
  • 7Kuh, G.D. "The National Survey of Student Engagement: Conceptual and Empirical Foundations, "New Directions for Institutional Researck. 141 (2009). 5 - 20.
  • 8Kuh, G. D. , Kinzie, J. , Buckley, J.A. , Bridges, B. K. , & Hayek, J. C. "What matters to student success: A review of the Literature, "National Postsecondary Education Cooperative (NPEC) Commissioned Paper, 2006, June.
  • 9Kuh, G.D. "What Student Affairs Professionals Need to Know About Student Engagement,"Journal of College student Development 50,9 (2009).
  • 10Kuh, G.D. "The National Survey of Student Engagement: Conceptual and Empirical Foundations,"New Directions for Institutional Research 141 (2009) :56.

共引文献529

同被引文献52

引证文献5

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部