摘要
目的:观察曲衍海动态取穴法对腹痛针刺的临床疗效。方法:选择以腹痛为主症的患者164例,随机分为研究组与对照组各82例。在辨证基础上,对照组采用常规分寸取穴法,直接取相关腧穴针刺;研究组采用曲衍海动态取穴法,即分别以各相关腧穴为基础循经按压,取压痛最敏感点针刺。每日治疗1次,每次30min,中间行针2次,观察治疗≤14天,比较两种取穴方法的临床效果。结果:研究组与对照组愈显率分别为93.1%和58.6%,研究组优于对照组(P<0.01);研究组与对照组总有效率分别为100%和97.6%,两组比较无显著性差异(P>0.05)。结论:曲衍海动态取穴法对腹痛的针刺治疗效果更为显著。
Objective:To observe the curative effect on abdominal pain by dynamic point location method from QU Yan-hai.Methods:164 patients with abdominal pain were enrolled in the experiment.They were divided into a treatment group and a control group evenly.Based on syndrome differentiation,the control group adopted the conventional point location method, acupuncturing the related points directly, and the treatment group a-dopted dynamic point location method from QU Yan-hai,first locating the point by the conventional point lo-cation method, then pressing along the channel nearby the points, puncturing into the most tender points.Pa-tients in both groups were punctured with the same conventional techniques retaining the needles for 30 mi-nutes every day.During the needle retaining period, manipulate the needles twice.Observation duration was less than 14 days.Results:The curative and markedly effective rates in the treatment group and control group were 93.1% and 58.6% respectively.There was a significant difference between two groups ( P 〈0.01 ) . Meanwhile, the total effective rates in the treatment group and control group were 100%and 97.6% respec-tively.There was no significant difference between two groups( P〉0.05).Conclusion:Effect on abdominal pain by dynamic point location method from QU Yan-hai is obviously better than that by conventional meth-od.
出处
《中医药信息》
2015年第3期94-96,共3页
Information on Traditional Chinese Medicine
基金
山东省中医药科技发展计划项目(No.2007-203)
关键词
曲衍海
动态取穴法
腹痛
QU Yan-hai
Dynamic point location method
Abdominal pain
Efficacy