期刊文献+

马尾沉降征在腰椎管狭窄症诊断中的价值 被引量:18

Diagnostic value of the nerve root sedimentation sign for lumbar spinal stenosis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 评价马尾沉降征在腰椎管狭窄症诊断中的价值并对其分型进行改良.方法 2012年11月至2013年11月因腰痛伴间歇性跛行而行MR检查的患者511例,选取椎管最狭窄层面的横断面MRI图像.按Schizas分型将患者分为A1、A2、A3、A4、B、C和D七型,测量各组的硬膜囊横截面积;对没有差异的组进行合并,制定新的马尾沉降征分型.比较马尾沉降征二分法、Schizas分型、新的马尾沉降征分型与硬膜囊横截面积分型法的相关性与一致性.比较新的分型方法各组患者的Oswestry功能障碍指数(Oswestry disability index,ODI)的差异.结果 Schizas分型A1型与A2型、A4型与B型、C型与D型组间硬膜囊横截面积的差异无统计学意义,合并后新的马尾沉降征分型分为阴性、a、b、c四型.马尾沉降征二分法与硬膜囊横截面积分型法的相关性为rs=0.579,一致性为κ=0.254;Schizas分型法与硬膜囊横截面积分型法的相关性为rs=0.718,一致性为κ=0.171;而新的马尾沉降征分型法与硬膜囊横截面积分型法的相关性为rs=0.722,一致性为κ=0.381,较前两种分型均提高.新的马尾沉降征分型各组ODI评分的差异有统计学意义(F=17.972,P=0.000);其中c型组与其他各组比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 新的马尾沉降征分型与马尾沉降征二分法和Schizas分型比较,可以更加准确地反映MRI腰椎管狭窄程度,并在一定程度上反映患者主观临床症状的严重程度. Objective To evaluate the diagnostic value of the nerve root sedimentation sign for lumbar spinal stenosis and improve morphological classification.Methods This is a retrospective radiologic study.From November 2012 to November 2013,511 patients who carried out MR examination due to backache together with intermittent claudication were selected.Cross-section MRI images at the narrowest layer of canalis spinalis were chosen.The patients were further divided into 7 groups,A1,A2,A3,A4,B,C,and D based on Schizas.The dural sac cross-sectional area (DSCA) of each group was measured.The groups without difference were merged.A new method to grade nerve root sedimentation was developed.Then,the correlation and consistency of nerve root sedimentation dichotomy,Schizas classification,new nerve root sedimentation classification and DSCA classification were compared.The differences of patients' Oswestry disability index (ODI) which adopted new classification method were compared.Results Results show there are no statistical significance between groups A1 and A2,groups A4 and B,or groups C and D in DSCA.After the merger,new nerve root sedimentation classification includes negative,a,b,and c.The correlation between nerve root sedimentation dichotomy and DSCA method is rs=0.579,and the consistency is κ=0.254.The correlation between new nerve root sedimentation classification method and DSCA method is rs=0.722,and the consistency is κ=0.381.The scores improve compared with the first two classification methods.ODI score difference of each group which adopted new nerve root sedimentation classification method has statistical signiftcance (F=17.972,P=0.000).Pairwise comparison shows only group c differs significantly from other groups (P<0.05).Conclusion The new nerve root sedimentation classification method is more effective than nerve root sedimentation dichotomy and Schizas grading.It reflects the severity degree of patients'clinical symptoms to some extent.
出处 《中华骨科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第6期636-642,共7页 Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics
关键词 腰椎 椎管狭窄 马尾 磁共振成像 Lumbar vertebrae Spinal stenosis Cauda equina Magnetic resonance imaging
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1] Deyo RA. Treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: a balancing act[J]. Spine J, 2010, 10(7): 625-627.
  • 2MaxA,VincentA,JohnKW.AO脊柱手册[M].陈仲强,袁文,译.济南:山东科学技术出版社,2010:374-375.
  • 3Lohman CM, Tallroth K, Kettunen JA, et al. Comparison of radio- logic signs and clinical symptoms of spinal stenosis[J]. Spine (Phi- la Pa 1976), 2006, 31(16): 1834-1840.
  • 4马锐,陈建常.腰椎椎管狭窄症的诊断与治疗现状[J].检验医学与临床,2013,10(1):72-75. 被引量:16
  • 5Barz T, Markus M, Staub LP, et al. Nerve root sedimentation sign: evaluation of a new radiological sign in lumbar spinal stenosis[J]. Spine(Phila Pa 1976), 2010, 35(8): 892-897.
  • 6Barz T, Markus M, Staub LP, et al. Increased intraoperative epidu- ral pressure in lumbar spinal stenosis patients with a positive nerve root sedimentation sign[J]. Eur Spine J, 2014, 23(5): 985- 990.
  • 7李长青,周跃,梅芳瑞.神经源性间歇性跛行病理生理机制的研究进展[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,1998,8(6):347-349. 被引量:5
  • 8Takahashi K, Miyazaki T, Takino T, et al. Epidural pressure mea- surements. Relationship between epidural pressure and posture in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 1995, 20(6): 650-653.
  • 9Takahashi K, Kagechika K, Takino T, et al. Changes in epidural pressure during walking in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis [J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 1995, 20(24): 2746-2749.
  • 10Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry disability index[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2000, 25(22): 2940-2952.

二级参考文献36

  • 1张立,英旻,党耕町,王超.退变性腰椎管狭窄症患者颈椎管的X线测量[J].中华医学杂志,2006,86(45):3193-3196. 被引量:4
  • 2王明怀,王凯军,刘东钱,郭尚杰,林强.腰椎管狭窄症非手术治疗方法探讨[J].陕西中医学院学报,2007,30(4):42-43. 被引量:6
  • 3DEYO R A. Treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis:a balancing act[J]. Spine J,2010,10(7) :625-627.
  • 4MALMIVAARA A, SLTIS P, HELIVAARA M, et al. Surgical or nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis? a ran- domized controlled trial[ J ]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2007,32 (1) :1-8.
  • 5WEINSTEIN J N,TOSTESON T D, LURIE J D, et al. Surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis four- year results of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial [ J ]. Spine ( Phila Pa 1976), 2010,35 (14) : 1329-1338.
  • 6OOI Y, MITA K F, SATOH Y. Myeloscopic study on lumbar spinal canal stenosis with special reference to intermittent claudication [ J]. Spine, 1990,15:544-549.
  • 7MORISHITA Y, HIDA S, NAITO M, et al. Neurogenic inter- mittent claudication in lumbar spinal canal stenosis [ J]. J Spi- nal Disord Tech,2009,22 : 130-134.
  • 8FARDON D F, MILETFE P C. Combined Task Forces of the North American Spine Society, American Society of Spine Ra- diology, and American Society of Neuroradiology. Nomenclature and classification of lumbar disc pathology. Recommendations of the combined task forces of the North American Spine Society, American Society of Spine Radiology, and American Socie- ty of Neuroradiology [ J ]. Spine ( Phila Pa 1976 ), 2001,26 (5) :E93-E113.
  • 9SCHIZAS C ,THEUMANN N, BURN A, et al. Qualitative grad- ing of severity of lumbar spinal stenosis based on the morphol- ogy of the dural sac on magnetic resonance images [ J ]. Spine ( Phila Pa 1976) ,2010,35 ( 21 ) : 1919-1924.
  • 10LEE S,LEE J W, YEOM J S, et al. A practical MRI grading system for lumbar foraminal stenosis [ J ]. A JR Am J Roent- genol, 2010,194 ( 4 ) : 1095-1098.

共引文献38

同被引文献91

  • 1郝国兵,朱泽兴,冯晓玲,张楠,乔林.ULBD与PE-ULBD治疗老年退行性腰椎管狭窄症的疗效比较[J].中国医师杂志,2022,24(10):1571-1574. 被引量:1
  • 2于天泉,王义,刘昱,张进学,张德桂.侧隐窝狭窄的边界值[J].骨与关节损伤杂志,1993,8(1):7-9. 被引量:28
  • 3赵太茂,邱贵兴,仉建国,王以朋,翁习生,沈建雄,田野,赵宏,胡建华.291例腰椎管狭窄症患者的临床特点分析[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2006,16(11):812-815. 被引量:32
  • 4胥少汀,葛宝丰,徐印坎.实用骨科学[M].第4版.北京:人民军医出版社,2012:1857.
  • 5Spivak JM. D egenerative lumbar spinal steno- sis[J]. Bone Joint Surg(Am),1998,80(7):1053- 1066.
  • 6Dionne CE.Dunn KM,Croft PR. Does back pain prevalence really decrease with increas- ing age A systematic review[J]. Age Ageing, 2006.35:229-234.
  • 7Graaf I,Prak A,Bienna -Zeinstra S,et al. Diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosism systematic review of the accuracy of diagnostic tests[J]. Spine,2006,3 1:1168-1176.
  • 8Barz T,Melloh M,Staub L P,et al. Nerve root sedimentation sign:evaluation of a new radiological sign in lumbar spinal stenosis[J]. Spine, 2010,35(8):892-897.
  • 9Macedo LG,Wang Y,Batti6 MC. The sedimentation sign for differential diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis[J]. Spine,2013,38( 10): 827-831.
  • 10Tomkins-Lane CC,Quint DJ,Gabriel S,et al. Nerve root sedimentation sign for the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis|J]. Spine, 2013,38(24):E1554-1560.

引证文献18

二级引证文献91

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部