摘要
目的:比较腹部B超与阴道B超诊断异位妊娠的价值。方法:65例异位妊娠患者分别先后予以腹部B超与阴道B超检查,分析两种检查方式的诊断结果并与手术病理学结果进行比较,探讨两种检查方式对异位妊娠的诊断率率。结果:阴道B超的阳性确诊率为95.38%,高于腹部B超的78.46%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。阴道B超对胚芽、盆腔积液、附件包块、假孕囊及心血管搏动的检出率显著高于腹部B超,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:阴道B超诊断异位妊娠的阳性检出率明显高于腹部B超,能够减少漏诊、误诊率,且阴道B超具有简便、直观的优点。
Objective: To compare the values of abdominal and vaginal B-ultrasounds in the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy. Methods: A total of 65 patients with ectopic pregnancy were orderly given abdominal and vaginal B-ultrasounds. The results of above two detections were analyzed and compared with pathological results after surgery so as to explore the diagnostic rate of the two detections. Results: The positive diagnostic rate of vaginal B-ultrasound was 95. 38%,evidently higher than the 78. 46% by abdominal B-ultrasound,and there was significant difference( P〈0. 05). Vaginal B-ultrasound was markedly higher than abdominal one in the detection rates of germs,pelvic effusion,adnexal mass,phantom pregnancy bursa and cardiovascular pulsation,and the difference was significant( P〈0. 05). Conclusion: Vaginal B-ultrasound,as is significantly higher than abdominal B-ultrasound in the positive detection of ectopic pregnancy,can reduce the rates of missed diagnosis and diagnostic errors,and is marked by the advantages of convenience and perceptual intuition.
出处
《河南中医》
2015年第5期1120-1121,共2页
Henan Traditional Chinese Medicine
关键词
异位妊娠
腹部B超
阴道B超
ectopic pregnancy
abdominal B-ultrasound
vaginal B-ultrasound