期刊文献+

大网膜包裹的胰腺残端捆扎术预防胰漏的临床疗效 被引量:1

Great omental wrapping of pancreatic stump to prevent pancreatic leakage
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨大网膜包裹的胰腺残端捆扎术预防胰漏是胰腺远端切除术(d i s t a l pancreatectomy,DP)术后胰漏的安全性及有效性.方法:回顾性对比分析2011-01/2014-02 61例行DP患者的临床病理资料,根据胰腺残端处理方式分为2组:A组(捆扎组,n=19):采用大网膜包裹胰腺残端捆扎术处理胰腺残端;B组(非捆扎组,n=42):采用手工缝合法和闭合器法联合处理胰腺残端.结果:61例患者中共有18例(29.5%)发生了胰漏,A组有2例(10.5%)发生了胰漏,2例均为B级胰漏,B组有16例(38%)发生了胰漏,其中A级胰漏11例,B级胰漏5例,C级胰漏1例,两组术后胰漏发生率差异有明显统计学意义(P=0.03).结论:大网膜包裹的胰腺残端捆扎术能有效预防DP后胰漏的发生率,是一种安全可行的胰腺残端处理方式. AIM: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of great omental wrapping of pancreatic stump in preventing pancreatic leakage after distal pancreatectomy(DP).METHODS: Clinicopathologic data for 61 patients who underwent DP from January 2011 to February 2014 were analyzed retrospectively. These patients were divided into two groups: A and B. Group A(n = 19) underwent DP with great omental wrapping of the pancreatic stump, and group B(n = 42) underwent DP with manual suture and closure.RESULTS: Of the 61 patients, 18(29.5%) had pancreatic leakage after operation, including two(10.5%) cases in group A(1 case of grade A and 1 case of grade B) and 16(38%) cases in group B(11 cases of grade A, 5 cases of grade B and 1 case of grade C). The incidence of pancreatic leakage after operation had a significant statistical difference between the two groups(P = 0.03).CONCLUSION: Great omentum wrapping of the pancreatic stump could effectively prevent pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy, and it is a safe and feasible technique for pancreatic stump closure.
出处 《世界华人消化杂志》 CAS 2015年第14期2305-2309,共5页 World Chinese Journal of Digestology
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目 No.81071775~~
关键词 胰腺远端切除 胰漏 大网膜 Distal pancreatectomy Pancreatic leakage Great omentum
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献23

  • 1[1]Takeuchi K,Tsuzuki Y,Ando T,Sekihara M,Hara T,Kori T,Nakajima H,Kuwano H.Distal pancreatectomy:is staple closure beneficial? ANZ J Surg 2003; 73:922-925
  • 2[2]Sheehan MK,Beck K,Creech S,Pickleman J,Aranha GV.Distal pancreatectomy:does the method of closure influence fistula formation? Am Surg 2002; 68:264-267; discussion 267-268
  • 3[3]Sledzianowski JF,Duffas JP,Muscari F,Suc B,Fourtanier F.Risk factors for mortality and intra-abdominal morbidity after distal pancreatectomy.Surgery 2005; 137:180-185
  • 4[4]Balzano G,Zerbi A,Cristallo M,Di Carlo V.The unsolved problem of fistula after left pancreatectomy:the benefit of cautious drain management.J Gastrointest Surg 2005; 9:837-842
  • 5[5]Bassi C,Dervenis C,Butturini G,Fingerhut A,Yeo C,Izbicki J,Neoptolemos J,Sarr M,Traverso W,Buchler M.Postoperative pancreatic fistula:an international study group (ISGPF)definition.Surgery 2005; 138:8-13
  • 6[6]Fernandez-del Castillo C,Rattner DW,Warshaw AL.Standards for pancreatic resection in the 1990s.Arch Surg 1995;130:295-299; discussion 299-300
  • 7[7]Bilimoria MM,Cormier JN,Mun Y,Lee JE,Evans DB,Pisters PW.Pancreatic leak after left pancreatectomy is reduced following main pancreatic duct ligation.Br J Surg 2003; 90:190-196
  • 8[8]Sugo H,Mikami Y,Matsumoto F,Tsumura H,Watanabe Y,Futagawa S.Comparison of ultrasonically activated scalpel versus conventional division for the pancreas in distal pancreatectomy.J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2001; 8:349-352
  • 9[9]Fahy BN,Frey CF,Ho HS,Beckett L,Bold RJ.Morbidity,mortality,and technical factors of distal pancreatectomy.Am J Surg 2002; 183:237-241
  • 10[10]Balcom JH 4th,Rattner DW,Warshaw AL,Chang Y,Fernandez-del Castillo C.Ten-year experience with 733 pancreatic resections:changing indications,older patients,and decreasing length of hospitalization.Arch Surg 2001; 136:391-398

共引文献24

同被引文献7

引证文献1

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部