期刊文献+

人类的亲社会行为及其情境依赖性 被引量:12

Human Prosocial Behavior and Its Context-dependence
原文传递
导出
摘要 近年来,实验经济学通过行为博弈发现人类亲社会行为的普遍存在。即使改变相关的实验条件和参数设置,被试仍然表现出稳健的亲社会行为。之后,实验经济学家又通过田野实验嵌入不同的现实情境,进一步证实了亲社会行为的情境依赖性。这些实验结果为我们重新思考理性人自利假设,理解个体行为的复杂性,以及构建新的个体行为模型提供了重要的经验证据。 In recent years, experimental economists use behavioral experiments found that the prevalence of human prosocial behavior. Although scholars changed experimental conditions and parameters sets, subjects still had a stable prosocial behavior. Then experimental economists have developed the field experiments on the basis of laboratory experiments, they embedded different levels of real context on the experiment and found prosocial behavior context dependence. These experiments results will provide us important empirical evidence to rethink the assumption of homo economicus, understand the complexity and context-dependent behavior of the individual and build a new model of individual behavior decisions.
作者 罗俊 陈叶烽
出处 《学术月刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第6期15-19,共5页 Academic Monthly
关键词 亲社会行为 情境依赖 实验室实验 田野实验 prosocial behavior, context-dependence, laboratory experiment, field experiment
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Roth, A., Prasnikar,V., Okuno, M. and Zamir, S., "Bargaining and Market Behavior in Jerusalem, Ljubljana, Pittsburgh, and Tokyo: An Experimental Study", American Economic Review, 1991, 81, pp.1068-1095.
  • 2Blount, S., "When Social Outcomes aren't Fair: The Effect of Causal Attributions on Preference", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1995, 63, pp.131-144.
  • 3Smith, N., "Ultimatum and Dictator Games among the Chaldeans of Detroit", Talk to MacArthur Foundation Anthropology Project, 4, 2000.
  • 4Andreoni, J. and Miller, J. "Giving According to GARP: An Experimental Test of the Consistency of Preferences for Altruism", Econometrica, 2002, 70(2), pp.737-753.
  • 5Burks, S., Carpenter, J. and Verhoogen, E. "'Playing Both Roles in the Trust Game", Journal of Economic Behavior and Organiza~'on, 2003, 51, pp.195-216.
  • 6Fehr, E. and Gachter, S. "Fairness and Retaliation: The Economics of Reciprocity", Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2000, 14, pp.159-181.
  • 7Fehr, E., G. Kirehsteiger and A. Riedl, "D~s Fairness Prevent Market Clearing? An Experimental Investigation", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1993, 108, pp.437-440.
  • 8Fehr, E., S. Gachter and G. Kirchsteiger, "R~iprocity as a Contract Enforcement Device: Experimental Evidence", Econometrica, 1997, 65, pp.833-860.
  • 9Hart/son, G. and J. List, "Field Experiments", Journal of Economic Literature, 2004, 42(4), pp. 1009-1055.
  • 10Gneezy, Uri and J. List, "Putting Behavioral Economics to Work: Testing for Gift Exchange in Labor Markets Using Field Experiments", Econometrica, 2006, 74, pp. 1365-1384.

二级参考文献76

  • 1夏纪军.中国的信任结构及其决定——基于一组实验的分析[J].财经研究,2005,31(6):39-51. 被引量:31
  • 2魏光兴.公平偏好的博弈实验及理论模型研究综述[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2006,23(8):152-160. 被引量:33
  • 3陈叶烽,叶航.2008:《基于相关实验的社会偏好理论:一个综述》,浙江大学社会科学跨学科中心工作论文.
  • 4Andreoni, J., 1995, " Warm-Glow versus Cold-Prickle the Effects of Positive and Negative Framing on Cooperation in Experiments", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110( 1 ), pp. 1-21.
  • 5Andreonl, J. and Miller, J., 2002, "Giving According to GARP: An Experimental Test of the Consistency of Preferences for Ahruism", Econometrica, 70(2), pp. 737 753.
  • 6Ashley, R., Ball, S. and Eckel, C., 2009, "Motives for Giving: A Reanalysis of Two Classic Public Goods Experiments", CBEES working paper, School of Economic, Political and Policy Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas.
  • 7Ashraf, N., Bohnet, I. and Piankov, N., 2006, "Decomposing Trust and Trustworthiness", Experimental Economics, 9, pp. 193-208.
  • 8Berg, J., Dickaut, J. and McCabe, K., 1995, "Trust, Reciprocity and Social History", Glmes and Economic Behavior, 10.
  • 9Bohon, G.E. and Ockenfels, A., 2000, "ERC-A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity, and Competition", American Economic Review, 90(1).
  • 10Burks, S., Carpenter, J. and Verhoogen, E., 2003, "Playing Both Roles in the Trust Game", Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 51, pp. 195-216.

共引文献100

同被引文献132

引证文献12

二级引证文献101

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部