期刊文献+

分配正义与社会应得 被引量:79

Distributive Justice and Social Desert
原文传递
导出
摘要 应得是正义的核心概念,社会应得是分配正义的核心概念。分配正义既涉及每个人的自我所有权,又涉及每个人可分享的社会公共资源,涉及他从国家和社会中获取的社会权利和经济利益。每个人都拥有完全的自我所有权,这种所有权是他享有很多权利的基础,但不是他享有社会应得的基础。社会应得表示任何人都能够从社会中获得的公有价值或共享资源。社会应得的基础是人在共同体中享有的成员资格,这种资格取决于他在政治、社会和经济结构中的地位。社会公平意味着每个人在社会经济领域里得其应得。社会应得理论是一种社会资源分配理论,关注在社会基础资源分布、配置和分配中存在的社会公平问题。它既主张全面保护每个人的自我所有权,慎重对待自我所有权的交易、变更和补偿,又主张每个人均等地享有基本的社会资源,申明回到社会公平的起点,为缓和社会矛盾提供可行路线。 Desert is the core concept of justice,and social desert is the core concept of distributive justice.Distributive justice not only involves the self-ownership of each person,but also the public resources they share and the social rights and economic interests they acquire from the state and society.All people have total self-ownership,which forms the basis of many of the rights they enjoy,but this is not the basis of their social desert.Social desert means the public value and shared resources that each person can acquire from society.Its basis is people' s status as members of a community,a status determined by their position in the political,social and economic structure.Social justice means everyone gets their desert in the socioeconomic sphere.The theory of social desert is a theory of resource distribution concerned with the question of social justice in the spread,allocation and distribution of basic social resources.It advocates not only the protection of everyone' s self-ownership and careful treatment of self-ownership transactions,alterations,and compensation,but also everyone's equal enjoyment of basic social resources.Announcing a return to the starting point of social justice,it provides a feasible path to easing social contradictions.
作者 张国清
出处 《中国社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第5期21-39,203-204,共19页 Social Sciences in China
基金 国家社科基金重点项目"实用主义政治哲学研究"(项目编号13AZX016)和国家社科基金重大项目"实用主义研究"(项目编号14ZDB022)资助
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献16

  • 1葛四友.市场经济制度的道德根据:按贡献分配?[J].国际经济评论,2006(3):34-37. 被引量:5
  • 2休谟.《人性论》下册[M].商务印书馆,1980年.第508页,第515页.
  • 3麦金太尔.《德性之后》[M].中国社会科学出版社,1995年版..
  • 4麦金太尔 万俊人译.《谁之正义?何种合理性?》[M].当代中国出版社,1996年版.第198页.
  • 5《马克思恩格斯选集》第1卷.北京:人民出版社,1995年.第119页.
  • 6John RaMs, A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, Massachusetts : The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1971, p. 1, p. 58, p. 74.
  • 7George Sher, Desert, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1987, p. 24, p. 24, p. 27,p. 27, p. 53, p. 109.
  • 8Alan Zaitchik, "On Deserving to Deserve", in Lawrence C. Becker ed. , Equality and Justice, Vol. 6, Desert and Entitlement, 2003, p. 191, p. 192, p. 197.
  • 9George Sher, "Effort, Ability, and Personal Desert", in Lawrence C. Becker ed., Equality and Justice, Vol. 6, Desert and Entitlement, 2003, p. 162.
  • 10James Rachels, "What People Deserve", in John Arthur and William H. Shaw ed. , Justice and Economic Distribution, Prentice - Hall, 1978, p. 159.

共引文献47

同被引文献1189

引证文献79

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部