技术距离与技术引进企业技术多元化发展关系研究被引量：6

Research on the relationship between technology distance and subsequent development of technological diversification

导出

摘要本文以中国本土企业为研究对象,依据中国国家知识产权局专利许可备案登记数据、专利申请数据和中国工业企业数据,采取Tobit模型实证分析了2002-2005年间181家企业专利技术引进与其技术多元化发展的关系。研究表明,企业跨技术领域引进技术对其技术多元化发展存在消极作用;与国内技术许可引进相比,引进国外技术可以带来对技术多元化发展的积极效应;企业许可引进的相对技术年龄与其技术多元化发展之间存在倒U型关系。 This study is determined to explore the technological diversification phenomenon through technology licensing - ins pertaining to Chinese indigenous firms. Various data sources are used in the empirical analyses of 181 Chinese home - grown firms which are engaged in technology hcensing - in activities during 2000 - 2005, i.e. the registered records of patent technology licensing agreements and patent applications by the State Intellectual Property Office of the People＇ s Republic of China, and the annual survey of all Large - and Medium - scale companies by the National Bureau of Statistics. Through a Tobit model in the statistic analyses, it has been found that ：（ 1 ） technology licensing - ins across a wider technology domain negatively impact licensee finns＇ subsequent technological diversification development ; （ 2 ） technology licensing - ins across a longer geography distance, i.e. from advanced economies positively influence licensee firms＇ subsequent technological diversification development; （3） licensed - in technologies from a relative longer temporal distance exhibit a reverse ＂U＂ relationship with licensee firms＇ subsequent technological diversification development.

作者王元地刘凤朝陈劲黄加顺

机构地区 [ 清华大学创新管理研究中心大连理工大学经济与管理学部

出处《科研管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第2期11-18,共8页 Science Research Management

基金国家自然科学基金(71302133 71272171) 教育部人文社科基金(13YJC790154) 教育部博士点基金(20130181120057)

关键词技术多元化技术许可技术搜寻创新专利 technological diversification technology licensing technology search innovation patent

分类号 F204 [经济管理—国民经济]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献29

1Almeida, P. and B. Kogut, The exploration of technological diversity and the geographic localizationof innovation [ J ]. Small Business Economics, 1997. 9( 1 ) : 21 -31.
2Garcia-Vega, M., Does technological diversification pro- mote innovation?: An empirical analysis for European finns [J]. Research Policy, 2006. 35(2) : 230 -246.
3Kim, H. , H. Lim, and Y. Park, How should finns carry out technological diversification to improve their performance? An analysis of patenting of Korean finns [ J]. Economics of Inno- vation & New Technology, 2009. 18(8) : 99 - 116.
4Suzuki, J. and F. Kodama, Technological diversity of persis- tent innovators in Japan - Two case studies of large Japanese firms [J]. Research Policy, 2004. 33(3) : 531 -549.
5Kodama, F. , Technological diversification of Japanese indus- try [J]. Science, 1986. 233(4761): 291-296.
6Granstrand, O. , Towards a theory of the technology - based finn [J]. Research Policy, 1998. 27(5) : 465 -489.
7Patel, P. and K. Pavia, National systems of innovation under strain : The internationalization of corporate R&D, in Produc- tivity, Innovation and Economic Performance, R. Barrel, G. Mason, and M. Mahony, Editors [ M]. 1998.
8Cambridge U- niversity Press: Cambridge. Breschi, S. , F. Lissoni, and F. Malerba, Knowledge- re- latedness in finn technological diversification [ J]. Research Policy, 2003. 32 ( 1 ) : 69 - 87.
9Watanabe, C. , J.Y. Hur, and K. Matsumoto, Technologi- cal diversification and finn' s techno - economic structure : An assessment of Canon' s sustainable growth trajectory [ J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2005. 72( 1 ) : 11 -27.
10何郁冰,陈劲.企业技术多元化战略影响因素的实证研究[J].技术经济,2010,29(11):1-7. 被引量：6

二级参考文献48

1FAI F M.Corporate Technological Competence and The Evolution of Technological Diversification[M].Cheltenham:Edward Elgar,2003.
2CHIU Y C,LAI H C,LEE T Y,et al.Technological diversification,complementary assets,and performance[J].Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2008,75 (6):875-892.
3SUZUKI J,KODAMA F.Technological diversity of persistent innovators in Japan:two case studies of large Japanese firms[.J].Research Policy,2004,33(3):531-549.
4GARCIA-VEGA M.Does technological diversification promote innovation? An empirical analysis for European firms[J].Research Policy,2006,35 (2):230-246.
5CANTWELL J A,GAMBARDELLA A,GRANSTRAND O.The economics and management of technological diversification[C].London:Routledge,2004.
6GRANDSTRAND O,PATEL P,PAVITT K.Multi-technology corporations:why they have "distributed" rather than "distinctive core" competencies[J].California Management Review,1997,39(4) 18-25.
7BRUSONI S,PRENCIPE A,PAVITT K.Knowledge specialisation,orgenisational coupling,and the boundaries of the firm:why do firms know more than they make?[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,2001,46 (4):597-621.
8GAMBARDELLA A,TORRISI S.Does technological convergence imply convergence in markets?[J].Research Policy,1998,27(5):445-463.
9PATEL P,PAVITT K.The wide (and increasing) spread of technological competencies in the world's largest firms:a challenge to conventional wisdom[M]//CHANDLERA D.The dynamic firm:the role of technology,strategy,organization and regions.Oxford University Press,1998:192-213.
10MENDONCA S.The revolution within ICT and the shifting knowledge base of the world's largest companies[J].Economics of Innovation and New Technology,2006 (15):777-799.