摘要
汉武帝时征讨南越国,《史记》记载三路主力都是循岭北南下进军。照此实战经验,秦代征南越,当无《淮南子》所讲"分五军"之理。史学前辈吕思勉已经指出淮南说法的荒谬。据各可能的进军线路的地理、水文状况和地上考古的发现,驳正淮南的旧说,重新检讨秦征南越的线路和军事策略问题。
During the tion on the Nanyue Kingdo reign of the Emperor Liu Che in the Han Dynasty, he m. It was recorded by The Historical Records that three south of the Five Ridges by passing through the north of the Five Ridges. In light mounted a military expedi- main troops were sent to the of the actual combat experi- ence, there would be no reason for the Qin Dynasty, when mounting a military expedition on the Nanyue King- dom, to have sent five troops to the south of the Five Ridges as it described in the book Huainan Tzu. The his- torian LV Simian has pointed out this absurdity in Huainan Tzu. Based on the geography, the hydrological conditions and the archeological findings of the possible expedition routes, this paper rectifies the outdated doctrines of Huainan Tzu, and reexamines the routes and the strategic planning of the military expedition on the Nanyue Kingdom mounted by the Qin Dynasty.
出处
《湖南科技大学学报(社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第2期121-129,共9页
Journal of Hunan University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)
关键词
秦征南越
线路
《淮南子》
the Qin Dynasty mounted a military expedition on the Nanyue Kingdom
route
Huainan Tzu