期刊文献+

25G+超高速玻璃体切割手术治疗孔源性视网膜脱离疗效观察 被引量:3

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察25G+超高速玻璃体切割手术治疗孔源性视网膜脱离(RRD)的临床疗效。方法对36例36眼RRD行25G+超高速玻璃体切割手术治疗,剥膜,激光封闭裂孔,眼内填充C3F8或硅油,术后面向下体位。所有患者均行最佳矫正视力、眼压、90D前置镜、眼B型超声等检查,记录手术时间和术中并发症。随访3个月以上,观察最佳矫正视力、眼压及并发症的发生情况。结果平均手术时间为(49.61±11.06)min,术中发生医源性损伤者为1眼,术后未发现有早期低眼压和脉络膜脱离者,视网膜复位36眼(100%),术后视力较术前明显提高,差异有统计学意义(<0.01)。结论 25G+超高速玻璃体切割手术治疗PRD可缩短手术时间,减少手术并发症,可安全有效地用于治疗各种视网膜脱离患者。
出处 《现代实用医学》 2015年第5期659-660,662,共3页 Modern Practical Medicine
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Chen E. 25-Gauge transconjtmctival sut- ureless vitrectomy[J]. CurrOpin Ophthal- mol, 2007,18:188-193.
  • 2Parolini B, Prigione G, Romanelli F, et al. Postoporative complications and intraocu- lar pressure in 943 consecutivecases of 23-gauge transconjunctival pars plana vit- rectomy with 1-yearfollow-up[J]. Retina, 2010,30: 107-111.
  • 3Spirn MJ.Comparison of 25, 23 and 20- gauge vitrectomy[J]. Curr Opin Ophthal- mol, 2009, 20: 195-199.
  • 4Oshima Y, Kadonosono K, Yamaji H, et al. Multicenter surveywith a systematic overview of acute-onset endophthalmitis attertransconjunctival microincision vit- rectomy surgery[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2010,150:716-725.
  • 5Rizzo S, Genovesi-Ebert F, Belting C. Comparative study between a standard 25-gauge vitrectomy system and a new ultra high-speed 25-gauge system with duty cycle control in the treatment of various vitreoretinal diseases[J]. Retina, 2011,31: 2007-2013.
  • 6曾洪波,陈长征.23G和25G+玻璃体切割手术治疗增生型糖尿病视网膜病变的疗效对比观察[J].中华眼底病杂志,2014,30(2):145-147. 被引量:18
  • 7蔡文泉,郑志,李涛,陈凤娥,许迅.23-G与20-G玻璃体切割术对视网膜脱离的临床疗效分析[J].上海交通大学学报(医学版),2012,32(2):151-154. 被引量:14

二级参考文献22

  • 1Eckardt C. Transconjunctival sutureless 23-gauge vitrectomy [ J] Retina, 2005, 25(2) : 208 -211.
  • 2Wimpissinger B, Kellner L, Brannath W, et al. 20-gauge system for pars plana vitrectomy : a prosl: clinical trial[ J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2008, 92( 11 23-Gauge versus ective randomised ) : 1483 - 1487.
  • 3Nagpal M, Wartikar S, Nagpal K. Comparison of clinical outcomes and wound dynamics of sclerotomy ports of 20, 25, and 23 gauge vitrectomy[J]. Retina, 2009, 29(2): 225-231.
  • 4Fujii GY, De Juan E Jr, Humayun MS, et al. A new 25-gauge instrument system for transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy surgery [J]. Ophthalmology, 2002, 109(10): 1807-1812.
  • 5Spirn MJ. Comparison of 25, 23 and 20-gauge vitrectomy[ J]. Curt Opin Ophthalmol, 2009, 20(3): 195-199.
  • 6Sisk RA, Murray TG. Combined phacoemulsification and sutureless 23-gauge pars plana vitrectomy for complex vitreoretinal diseases [J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2010, 94(8) : 1028 -1032.
  • 7Parolini B, Prigione G, Romanelli F, et al. Postoperative complications and intraocular pressure in 943 consecutive cases of 23-gauge transconjunctival pars plana vitrectomy wilh 1-year follow-up [ J ]. Retina, 2010, 30(1): 107-111.
  • 8Albrieux M, Rouberol F, Bernheim D, et al. Comparative study of 23-gauge vitrectomy versus 20-gauge vitrectomy for the treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment [ J ]. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2011, 249(10) : 1459 - 1468.
  • 9Helbig H. Surgery for diabetic retinopathy [J]. Ophthalmologica, 2007, 221:103-111.
  • 10Sarrafizadeh R. Surgical management of diabetic traction retinal detachment [J]. Tech Ophthalmol, 2003, 1.. 218-222.

共引文献30

同被引文献20

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部