期刊文献+

尴尬易感性量表中文版用于大学生样本的效度和信度 被引量:3

Validity and Reliability of the Susceptibility to Embarrassment Scale in Chinese College Students
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:在中国大学生群体中引入尴尬易感性量表(susceptibility to embarrassment scale,SES)并检验其信效度。方法:采用中文SES对1240名大学生进行了调查,共收回有效问卷1136份。另用特质内疚量表、羞耻量表、羞怯量表、社交焦虑量表在90名大学生中检验预测效度和效标关联效度。间隔4周后,随机抽取60名大学生进行重测。结果:中文SES包括自我形象担忧、过度关注他人评价、低社交效能和负性体验4个分量表,共23个条目;验证性因素分析显示数据拟合良好(χ^2/df=2.93,CFI=0.89,TLI=0.91,RMSEA=0.06,SRMR=0.07);量表总分与特质内疚、羞耻、羞怯、社交焦虑的相关系数在0.28-0.45之间;4个分量表的Cronbach’sα系数为0.68-0.89,重测信度为0.67-0.80。结论:中文尴尬易感性量表在大学生中使用的各项信、效度指标均符合心理测量学要求。 Objective:To investigate the psychometric attributes of the Chinese Version of Susceptibility to Embarrass-ment scale(SES).Methods:1240 university students were asked to complete the Chinese version of SES,90 of which wereadditional asked to complete Trait Guilty Scale,Social Anxiety Inventory,Shame Scale,Shyness Scale and a self-assess-ment embarrassment item.60 students were chosen to complete the Chinese version of SES after four weeks.Results:Ex-ploratory and confirmatory factor analyses yielded four factors:self-image concerns,excessive focus on others evaluation,low social efficiency and negative experience,with Cronbach'a coeffients ranging from 0.68 to 0.89 and the test-retest reli-abilities ranging from 0.67 to 0.80.The criterion validity was also acceptable in this sample.Conclusion:The Chinese ver-sion of SES can be uesd as an effective instrument to assess the embarrassment proneness in Chinese university students.
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2015年第3期401-405,462,共6页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
关键词 尴尬倾向 效度 信度 Embarrassment pronness Validity Reliability
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1孙艳华,马伟娜.尴尬情绪的研究述评[J].健康研究,2009,29(6):484-488. 被引量:9
  • 2Ekman P. An argument for basic emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 1992, 6(3-4): 169-200.
  • 3Kehner D, Buswell B N. Embarrassment: Its distinct form and appeasement functions. Psychological Bulletin, 1997, 122(3): 250-270.
  • 4Jimenez L,Walkerdine V. A psychosocial approach to shame, embarrassment and melancholia amongst unemployed young men and their fathers. Gender and Education, 2011, 23(2): 185-199.
  • 5Coffaro F. The effects of embarrassment on cognition and be- havior. San Diego, University of California, 2011.
  • 6Darby RS, Harris CR. Embarrassment' s effect on facial pro- cessing. Cognition and Emotion, 2010, 24(7): 1250-1258.
  • 7Sabini J, Garvey B, Hall AL. Shame and embarrassment re- visited. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2001, 27 (1): 104-117.
  • 8Kelly KM, Jones WH. Assessment of dispositional embarras- sability. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 1997, 10(4): 307-333.
  • 9Modigliani A. Embarrassment and embarrassability. Sociom- etry, 1968. 313-326.
  • 10Alansari BM. Situational Embarrassment Scale manual. Ku- wait: Univer-sity Book Home, 1996.

二级参考文献34

  • 1许又新.耻感、神经症与文化[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1988,2(3):125-127. 被引量:8
  • 2李文利,钱铭怡.状态特质焦虑量表中国大学生常模修订[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版),1995,31(1):108-114. 被引量:209
  • 3韩登亮,齐志斐.大学生手机成瘾症的心理学探析[J].当代青年研究,2005(12):34-38. 被引量:223
  • 4曹枫林,苏林雁,高雪屏.网络成瘾的流行状况及成因[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2007,15(3):297-299. 被引量:8
  • 5汪向东,王希林,马弘.心理卫生评定量表手册:增订版.北京:中国心理卫生杂志社,1999:127.
  • 6Eiseh HA, Marianov V. Employee positioning and workload allocation. Computers and Operations Research, 2008, 35 (2): 513-524.
  • 7Fisherl CD. Boredom at work: A neglected concept. Human Relations, 1993, 46(3): 395-417.
  • 8Binnema D. Interrelations of psychiatric patient experiences of boredom and mental health. Issues in Mental Health Nu- rsing, 2004, 25(8): 833-842.
  • 9Seib HM, Vodanovich SJ. Cognitive correlates of boredom proneness: The role of private self-consciousness and ab- sorption. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 1998, 132(6): 642-652.
  • 10Eastwood JD, Cavaliere C, Fahlman SA, et al. A desire for desires: Boredom and its relation to alexithymia. Personal- ity and Individual Differences, 2007, 42(6): 1035-1045.

共引文献125

同被引文献83

引证文献3

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部