期刊文献+

解释认知偏差矫正效果及其对先前记忆的影响 被引量:1

The Effects of Cognitive Bias Modification of Interpretation and Its Influence on the Previous Memory
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:研究解释偏差矫正训练(Cognitive Bias Modification of Interpretation,CBM-I)对个体解释偏差的改变效果及对先前记忆的影响。方法:选取54名健康大学生为被试,首先为其呈现无结尾的模糊情景,并要求为该情景续写一个结局,之后将被试随机分配至对模糊情景进行积极解释的训练组(n=27)或消极解释的训练组(n=27)进行CBM-I训练。结果:积极组比消极组对积极探测情景的反应时更短(P<0.001),消极组比积极组对消极探测情景反应时更短(P<0.05);对新的模糊情景进行相似度评估,积极组比消极组倾向于积极解释(P=0.06),消极组比积极组倾向于消极解释(P<0.05);对先前记忆内容(即先前续写的模糊情景结局)的回忆效价更倾向于CBM-I训练效价(消极训练组P<0.05)。结论:CBM-I训练能有效改变解释偏差倾向,且对训练前的记忆产生定向影响。 Objective:To examine whether CBM-I training could induce the directive changing of individual's interpre-tation bias and whether it could affect the previous memory.Methods:The subjects were 54 healthy college students.Theywere provided with some ambiguous situations and were asked to image that they were in the situations and write endingsfor them.Then they were assigned randomly into the positive group(n=27) or the negative group(n=27) of CBM-Itraining.Results:The reaction times to the positive probe situations of positive group were shorter than negative group significantly(P〈0.001),while the reaction times to the negative probe situations of negative group were shorter than positive group(P〈0.05);When they were requested to assess the similarity between the fresh ambiguous situations and the statements provid-ed with emotional valence,positive group tended to explain more positively than negative group(P=0.06),and negativegroup tended to make more negative interpretations than positive group(P〈0.05).When they were asked to recall the previ-ous memory of those situations and the endings they wrote,the negative group remembered more negative previous reactions(P〈0.05).Conclusion:The CBM-I training could change the interpretation bias effectively andaffect the previous memory.
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2015年第3期410-415,共6页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基金 北京市教委科技面上项目(KM201210028014) 国家自然科学基金面上项目(31470980)
关键词 认知偏差矫正 解释偏差 记忆 模糊情景 Cognitive bias modification Interpretation bias Memory Ambiguous situation
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1Siemer M, Mauss IB, Gross JJ. Same situation-different em- otions: How appraisals shape our emotions. Emotion, 2007, 7 (3): 592- 600.
  • 2Mathews A, MacLeod C. Cognitive vulnerability to emotional disorders. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 2005, 1(1): 167-195.
  • 3Courtney B, Risa BW, Nader A. Combined cognitive bias modification treatment for social anxiety disorder: a pilot tria. Depression and Anxiety, 2011, 28(11): 981-988.
  • 4Beard, Courtney, Amir, Nader. A multi-session interpreta- tion modification program: Changes in interpretation and so- cial anxiety symptoms. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 2008, 46(10): 1135-1141.
  • 5Salemink E, Wiers RW. Modifying Threat-related Interpre- tive Bias in Adolescents. Journal of Abnormal Child Psycho- logy, 2011, 39(7): 967-997.
  • 6Everaert J, Koster EH, Derakshan N. The combined cogni- tive bias hypothesis in depression. Clinical Psychology Re- view, 2012, 32(5): 413-424.
  • 7Hertel PT, Brozovich F, Joormann J, Gotlib IH. Biases in in- terpretation and memory in Generalized Social Phobia. Jour- nal of Abnormal Psychology, 2008, 117(2): 278-288.
  • 8李丹枫,余真真,段添翼,陈昕昱,杨智辉.解释偏向矫正对大学生演讲焦虑的影响[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2014,22(1):43-47. 被引量:8
  • 9Rusting CL, DeHart T. Retrieving positive memories to reg- ulate negative mood: Consequences for mood-congruent memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2000, 78(4): 737.
  • 10Joormann, Jutta, Siemer, Matthias. Memory accessibility, mood regulation, and dysphoria: Diffieuhies in repairing sad mood with happy memories.'? Journal of Abnormal Psycholo- gy, 2004, 113(2): 179-187.

二级参考文献21

  • 1黄光扬.大学生演讲焦虑及影响因素的研究[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1996,10(2):68-69. 被引量:11
  • 2张雨新,心理学报,1991年,23卷,1期,99页
  • 3荆其诚,简明心理学百科全书,1991年
  • 4谢小庆,因素分析,1989年
  • 5Brydon SR, Scott MD. Between one and many : The art and science of public speaking. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing Co, 2006.
  • 6杨丽.认知行为团体疗法对大学生公众演讲焦虑的干预研究.华中师范大学,2008.
  • 7Mathews A, MacLeod C. Induced processing biases have causal effects on anxiety. Cognition and Emotion, 2002, 16 (3): 331-354.
  • 8Grey S, Mathews A. Effects of training on interpretation of emotional ambiguity. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 2000, 53(4): 1143-1162.
  • 9Holmes EA, Mathews A, Dalgleish T, et al. Positive interpre- tation training: Effects of mental imagery versus verbal train- ing on positive mood. Behavior Therapy, 2006, 37(3): 237- 247.
  • 10Mathews A, Mackintosh B. Induced emotional interpretation bias and anxiety. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 2000, 109 (4): 602.

共引文献216

同被引文献10

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部