期刊文献+

我国专利创造性判定中的整体性评审与模型构造研究 被引量:7

On Principle of Judgment with Integrity in the Process of Objective Judgment of Patent Inventive Step in China and Model Construction
原文传递
导出
摘要 专利创造性判断过程中引入客观性因素,落实整体评价原则,使得专利创造性判断的结果更趋真实地反映人类科技的进步,并且使判断结果具有相对的可重复性和稳定性,是专利法及专利制度的应有之义。创造性判断中的整体性原则是适应创造性客体系统性内在需要的必然选择,是实现创造性判断客观化的内在构成部分与重要保障机制。基于我国专利判断实践案例的实证研究显示,区别技术特征效果、常规试验能力等因素是重要的判别点,并据此构造了创造性判断模型。 The introduction of objective factors in the process of judgment of patent inventive step and the implementation of the principle of judgment with integrity to make the results of the judgment of patent inventive step more truly reflect technological progress and relatively repeat- able and stable are the proper meanings of patent law and patent system. The principle of judg- ment with integrity in inventive step is the inevitable choice in terms of the adaption to systematic intrinsic needs of the creative objects, and also the intrinsic component ~ important guarantee mechanism of the objectivity of creation judgment. Empirical research based on China's patent judgment case studies shows that technical characteristics, conventional test ability and other factors are the key discrimination points, and a creation judgment model could be established accord- ingly.
作者 黄国群
出处 《上海财经大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第3期105-113,共9页 Journal of Shanghai University of Finance and Economics
基金 国家社科基金重大项目"信息服务与信息交易法律制度研究"(13&ZD178) 国家自然科学基金"基于国际专利制度的同族专利行为及其态势研究"(71103067)的成果
关键词 专利 创造性 客观化判断 判断模型 实证研究 patent inventive step objectivity judgment judgment model empirical research
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1和育东,方慧聪.专利创造性客观化问题研究[J].知识产权,2007,17(2):76-81. 被引量:22
  • 2R S Praveen Raj. Inventive Step or Non-obviousness of an Invention, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, Vol. 10, 2005,p.233.
  • 3Paul F. Burke, Markus Reitzig,Measuring patent assessment quality-Analyzing the degree and kind of (in)consistency in patent offices decision making, Research Policy, Vol. 36,2007, pp. 1403.- 1430.
  • 4石必胜.论专利创造性判断的客观化[J].科技与法律,2012(2):75-79. 被引量:4
  • 5陈志兴.《浅析创造性判断中公知常识的理解与适用》,《加强专利代理行业建设,有效服务国家发展大局-2013年中华全国专利代理人协会年会暨第四届知识产权论坛论文选编》,第387397页.
  • 6Baden, Gregory R. Third-Party Assistance in Determining Obviousness, Texas Law Review Vol. 89,2011, pp. 1203- 1227.
  • 7周胜生,张仁杰,王大鹏,唐华东.TRIZ理论在专利创造性判断中的应用研究[J].电子知识产权,2012(1):68-72. 被引量:3
  • 8庞建英.用模糊决策理论判断发明创造性初探[J].太原理工大学学报,1999,30(1):54-56. 被引量:2
  • 9杨军艳,赵鑫.《PEACE法判断技术启示一浅谈判断技术启示的五个方面》,《中国知识产权》2011年第8期.
  • 10W.R. Ashby. An Introduction to Cybernetics, London : Chapman and Hall, 1956, pp. 120- 139.

二级参考文献20

  • 1庞建英.科研管理中的立项问题[J].高教研究,1993,:61-61.
  • 2杨清亮.发明是这样诞生的-TRIZ理论全接触[M].北京:机械工业出版社.2009.
  • 3王亮申,等.TRIZ创新理论与应用原理[M].北京:科学出版社.2010.
  • 4European Patent Convention, 1973年签署,1978年生效.
  • 5"Flash of creative genius". See Honorable Giles S. Rich, Laying the Ghost of the "Invention" Requirement, in Foundations of Intellectual Property (Foundation Press 2004) (Robert P. Merges, Jane C. Ginsburg), 93.
  • 6Graham v. John Deere,383 U.S. 1.
  • 7David F. Noble, The Corporation as Inventor, Patent-Law Reform and Patent Monopoly,in Foundations of Intellectual Property ( Foundation Press 2004) (Robert P. Merges, Jane C. Ginsburg), 41.
  • 8Edmund W. Kitch, Graham v. John Deere Co. : New Standards for Patents, in Foundations of Intellectual Property ( Foundation Press 2004) ( Robert P. Merges, Jane C. Ginsburg, ed. ), 102.
  • 9American Law Institute: Restatement of the Law, Torts (Second), Pamphlet 2, West Group (1965), 12 -13.
  • 10U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) ,Manual of Patent Examining Procedure,8th ed. (2001).

共引文献26

同被引文献101

引证文献7

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部