摘要
专利创造性判断过程中引入客观性因素,落实整体评价原则,使得专利创造性判断的结果更趋真实地反映人类科技的进步,并且使判断结果具有相对的可重复性和稳定性,是专利法及专利制度的应有之义。创造性判断中的整体性原则是适应创造性客体系统性内在需要的必然选择,是实现创造性判断客观化的内在构成部分与重要保障机制。基于我国专利判断实践案例的实证研究显示,区别技术特征效果、常规试验能力等因素是重要的判别点,并据此构造了创造性判断模型。
The introduction of objective factors in the process of judgment of patent inventive step and the implementation of the principle of judgment with integrity to make the results of the judgment of patent inventive step more truly reflect technological progress and relatively repeat- able and stable are the proper meanings of patent law and patent system. The principle of judg- ment with integrity in inventive step is the inevitable choice in terms of the adaption to systematic intrinsic needs of the creative objects, and also the intrinsic component ~ important guarantee mechanism of the objectivity of creation judgment. Empirical research based on China's patent judgment case studies shows that technical characteristics, conventional test ability and other factors are the key discrimination points, and a creation judgment model could be established accord- ingly.
出处
《上海财经大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第3期105-113,共9页
Journal of Shanghai University of Finance and Economics
基金
国家社科基金重大项目"信息服务与信息交易法律制度研究"(13&ZD178)
国家自然科学基金"基于国际专利制度的同族专利行为及其态势研究"(71103067)的成果
关键词
专利
创造性
客观化判断
判断模型
实证研究
patent
inventive step
objectivity judgment
judgment model
empirical research