期刊文献+

明代王亲政策的政治寓意与伦理困境 被引量:2

The Political Implications and Ethical Dilemma of the Policy toward Relatives of Imperial Family in the Ming Dynasty
原文传递
导出
摘要 王亲,即王府亲戚。明代的王亲政策,是在藩禁日严、王亲的平民化与人数日增的背景下展开的。对王亲的优礼,意在有限度地广亲亲之恩,范围极为有限。授官限于王妃父与世子妃父;优免差役限于王妃父、将军夫人父之家;优礼考核与致仕限于布政使身份的王亲。但优礼的程度与爵位尊卑、血脉疏近成正比,符合伦理常情。对王亲的禁制,意在最大限度地制藩,如王亲不任京官,王亲居官者禁与缔姻宗室同城,王亲禁掌兵权等。王亲禁制的范围,经历了从悉禁所有宗室之亲及其族属到仅禁亲王、郡王爵级的王亲及其"同祖亲枝",即从宽泛到更精确地定位于潜在威胁皇权的王亲群体,合于情理,达到了限王亲而制宗藩的目的,但也陷入了愈亲者禁之愈严、愈疏者禁之愈阔的伦理困境。 Relatives of the Ming imperial family refers to relatives of prince families. In the Ming dynasty the policy toward relatives of prince families was practiced in the background of increasingly strict banning on princedom and plebification of relatives of royal relatives by marriage. Favored treatments to relatives of prince families had the purpose of expressing giving grace to relatives of the royal househould, and the boundary was strictly limited. Granting office was limited to princess' father and father of the wife of a prince' s and Commandery Princece' s eldest son. Favored exemption of corvee was limited to princess' father and father of the wife of a general. Favored evaluation of official performances and ending official career were limited to commissioner relatives of a prince. But the degree of preferring treatment and the rank of nobility were determined reasonably by distance of blood linkage. Banning on relatives of prince families aimed at checking princedom in the highest degree, for example, relatives of prince families were not allowed acting as capital officials, as officials they were not promised to living in the same city where their families-in-marriage lived,relatives of prince families were not allowed to having military power, etc. The prohibitive targets changed from including all relatives of royal relatives by marriage and their clans to only prince' s and commandery prince's relatives and their clans, from loosely to more accurately selected princes who had potential menaces to royal sovereign. This change was reasonable and succeeded in checking and reducing the power of princedom, but it fell into an ethical dilemma of strict prohibition of direct clans and loose prohibition of indirect clans.
作者 吴恩荣
出处 《史学月刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第6期56-65,共10页 Journal of Historical Science
关键词 明代 王亲 宗室 京官 选官 优免 the Ming dynasty relatives of imperial family imperial clan capital officials selecting officials favored exemption
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1王兴亚.明代官吏的回避制度[J].河南大学学报(社会科学版),1991,31(1):66-72. 被引量:1
  • 2李春芳等:《宗藩条例》卷下《王亲仕格》,中国珍稀法律典籍集成乙编第2册,第582页.
  • 3戴金:《皇明条法事类纂》,中国珍稀法律典籍集成乙编第4册,科学出版社1994年版,第79页.
  • 4魏连科《明代宗室婚嫁制度》(《文史》第32辑,中华书局1990年版).
  • 5白昂等:《问刑条例》,中国珍稀法律典籍集成乙编第2册,科学出版社1994年版,第234页.

同被引文献48

  • 1张德信.明代诸王分封制度述论[J].历史研究,1985(5):76-91. 被引量:20
  • 2曾召南.试论明宁献王朱权的道教思想[J].宗教学研究,1998(4):9-14. 被引量:3
  • 3赵毅.明代宗室政策初探[J].东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版),1988(1):53-58. 被引量:15
  • 4王世贞:《弁山堂别集》卷32《同姓诸王表》,北京:中华书局,1985年,第562、562、576页.
  • 5何乔远:《名山藏》卷37《分藩记二》,宋祥瑞主编:《北京大学图书馆藏善本丛书·明清史料丛编》,北京:北京大学出版社,1993年,第2119、2044、2097页.
  • 6何乔远:《名山藏》卷6《典谟记》,宋祥瑞主编:《北京大学图书馆藏善本丛书·明清史料丛编》,北京:北京大学出版社,1993年,第360页.
  • 7张廷玉等:《明史》卷118《诸王三》,北京:中华书局,1985年,第3612-3614、3604、3603-3604、3604、3604页.
  • 8《明太宗实录》卷72,永乐五年十月庚戌,北京:线装书局,2005年,第3册,第96页.
  • 9何乔远:《名山藏》卷36《分藩记一》,宋祥瑞主编:《北京大学图书馆藏善本丛书·明清史料丛编》,北京:北京大学出版社,1993年,第2020、2030、2030、1996页.
  • 10何乔远:《名山藏》卷38《分藩记三》,宋祥瑞主编:《北京大学图书馆藏善本丛书·明清史料丛编》,北京:北京大学出版社,1993年,第2146、2154、2131页.

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部