期刊文献+

基于马尔可夫模型比较丙戊酸钠、托吡酯和苯妥英钠治疗癫痫的经济性 被引量:3

Comparison of Economy among Antiepileptic Agents Sodium Valproate,Topiramate and Dipheninum Based on Markov Model
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:比较丙戊酸钠、托吡酯和苯妥英钠治疗癫痫的经济性。方法:计算机检索Pro Quest、Pub Med、Springer、中国期刊全文数据库、中文科技期刊全文数据库、万方数字化期刊全文数据库,收集关于丙戊酸钠、托吡酯和苯妥英钠治疗癫痫的经济性研究,运用Tree Age Pro 2011.1.0.12.1软件构建马尔可夫(Markov)模型,通过计算成本-效果比(CER)对3种药物的经济性作出评价。结果:共纳入6项研究。苯妥英钠的CER值为29.99,丙戊酸钠的CER值为2 664.52,托吡酯的CER值为6 657.25,即苯妥英钠<丙戊酸钠<托吡酯。结论:单从经济学方面考虑,苯妥英钠是治疗癫痫最经济、有效的药物。由于纳入研究数量偏少,该结论有待大样本、高质量的研究进一步验证。 OBJECTIVE:To compare economy among sodium valproate(VPA),topiramate(TPM) and dipheninum(DPH)in the treatment of epilepsy(EP). METHODS:Retrieved from Pro Quest,Pub Med,Springer,CJFD,VIP,Wanfang database,researches about economy among VPA,TPM and DPH in the treatment of EP were collected. Tree Age Pro 2011.1.0.12.1 software was used to establish Markov model,and cost-effectiveness ratios(CER)of them were calculated to evaluate their economy. RESULTS:CER of DPH,VPA,TPM were 29.99,2 664.52 and 6 657.25,in ascending order of DPHVPATPM. CONCLUSIONS:Only considering about the economics,DPH is the most economical and effective medicine in the treatment of epilepsy.Due to small number of studies,large-scale and high quality studies are required for further validation of the conclusion.
出处 《中国药房》 CAS 北大核心 2015年第18期2506-2509,共4页 China Pharmacy
基金 国家科技支撑计划课题(No.2013BAI06B04)
关键词 经济性 马尔可夫模型 成本-效果分析 Epilepsy Markov model Cost-effectiveness analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Meng H, Guo G, Ren J, et al. Effects ofABCB1 polym- orphisms on plasma carbamazepine concentrations and pharmacoresistance in Chinese patients with epilepsyp [J]. Epilepsy Behav, 201 i, 21( 1 ) : 27.
  • 2冯乐,王莹,廉治刚,姜长斌.托吡酯与丙戊酸钠治疗癫痫的临床疗效比较[J].中国保健营养(下半月),2013,0(6):1394-1394. 被引量:5
  • 3杨琼.丙戊酸钠、苯妥英钠治疗癫痫的疗效观察[J].当代医学,2009,15(31):140-141. 被引量:9
  • 4安宁,林峰,解锦鼎.托吡酯与丙戊酸钠治疗癫痫的疗效对比观察[J].临床和实验医学杂志,2011,10(17):1357-1357. 被引量:6
  • 5姚丽萍,董玉红.丙戊酸钠与托吡酯治疗小儿癫痫的疗效观察[J].现代中西医结合杂志,2004,13(9):1158-1159. 被引量:4
  • 6Claus BO, Vandeputte FM, Robays H. Epidemiology and cost analysis of pharmacist interventions at Ghent Univer- sity Hospital[J]. lnt J Clin Pharm, 2012,34(5) : 773.
  • 7Harner HM, Dodel R, Strzelczyk A, et al. Prevalence, ut- ilization, and costs of antiepileptic drugs for epilepsy in Germany-a nationwide population-based study in children and adults[J]. JNeurol, 2012,259( 11 ) :2 376.
  • 8Jentink J, Boersma C, Berg LT, et al. Economic evalua- tion of anti-epileptic drug therapies with specific focus on teratogenic outcomes[J], d Med Econ, 2012,15 (5) : 862.
  • 9Chomba EN, Haworth A, Mbewe E, et al. The current availability of antiepileptic drugs in zambia: implications for the ILAE/WHO "out of the shadows" campaign[J]. Am d Trop Med Hyg, 2010,83(3) : 571.
  • 10Knoester PD, Deckers CL, Termeer EH, et al. A cost-ef- fectiveness decision model for antiepileptic drug treat- ment in newly diagnosed epilepsy patients[J]. Value in Health, 2007,10(3) : 173.

二级参考文献19

  • 1中华医学会神经病学分会癫痫与脑电图学组,王学峰.成人癫痫诊断和药物治疗规范(草案)[J].中华内科杂志,2006,45(10):875-877. 被引量:74
  • 2Macdonald Rl. Antiepileptic drug actions[J]. Epilepsia,1989,30(Suppl 1):19-28
  • 3Whiht HS,Brown SD,Skeen GA,et al. The anticonvulsant topiramate displays a unique ability to potentiate GABA-evoked chloride currents[J]. Epilepsia,1995,36(Suppl 3):39-40
  • 4Severt L,Coulter DA,Sombati S,et al. Topiramate selectively blocks kainat currents in cultured hippocampal neurons[J]. Epilepsia,1995,36(Suppl 4):38-39
  • 5Ben-Menachem E,Henriksen O,Dam M,et al. Double-blind placebo-controlled trial of topiramate as add-on therapy in patients with refractory partial seizures[J]. Epilepsia,1996,37(6):539
  • 6瞿治平.国际癫痫与癫痫综合征分类草案[J].中华神经精神杂志,1986,19(6):375-375.
  • 7吴建中.癫痫的患病率[A].吴逊.神经病学癫痫和发作性疾病[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2001.9-16.
  • 8吴逊.癫痫和发作性疾病[M]人民军医出版社,2001.
  • 9孙伟,毛薇,王玉平,王薇薇,吴逊.抗癫痫药对癫痫患者认知功能的影响[J].中国康复理论与实践,2010,16(7):648-649. 被引量:16
  • 10尹克金.托吡酯与丙戊酸钠治疗成人癫痫的疗效对比[J].吉林医学,2010,31(24):4106-4106. 被引量:3

共引文献19

同被引文献15

引证文献3

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部