期刊文献+

居民幸福感视角下的政府绩效研究——以乌鲁木齐市为例

Study of Government Performance in the View of Citizens'Happiness——Taking Urumqi City as an Example
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章以乌鲁木齐市为例研究居民幸福感视角下的政府绩效水平,探讨2者之间的关系。运用DEA分析方法评价政府公共服务行为的效率,得出在2000~2012年乌市政府绩效呈现下降的趋势,主要是由于规模效率水平的下降所导致的结论。之后分析政府绩效水平的影响因素,研究显示,地区生产总值与居民幸福感之间具有显著的正向关系;政府税收与居民幸福感之间具有显著的反向关系;城镇居民人均可支配收入与居民幸福感之间呈现反向关系。研究政府绩效水平有利于政府为提高居民幸福感而有效提供公共服务。 The paper studies government performance level under the perspective of the residents' happiness about Urumqi city, and explores the relationship between them It evaluates the efficiency of the government's public service behaviors with the method of DEA, and the conclusion is that the government performance showed a downward trend in the periods of 2000-2012, which mainly caused by the decline of scale efficiency's level. Then it analyzed the influencing factors of the level of government performance. We draw conclusions that there existed a significantly positive relationship between GDP and residential well being, and a significant inverse relationship between government revenues and residential well-being, urban residents' per capita disposable income and subjective well-being also reflects a reverse relation. Studying the level of government performance can be beneficial for our government to supply public service effectivdy so as to improve the residents' well-being in Urumqi.
作者 霍露萍
出处 《皖西学院学报》 2015年第3期71-75,共5页 Journal of West Anhui University
基金 2014年新疆财经大学科研创新项目(cdyjd2014008)
关键词 政府绩效 居民幸福感 DEA-TOBIT 乌鲁木齐市 government performance well being DEA-TOBIT Urumqi City
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1阿里·哈拉契米.政府业绩与质量测评(问题与经验)[M].张梦中,丁煌,译.广州:中山大学出版社,2003.
  • 2R. Veenhoven. Quality of Life in Individualistic Society.. A Comparison of 43 Nations in the Early 1990's[J]. Social Indicators Research, 1999,48(1): 157-186.
  • 3Osborene D, Plastrik P. The Reinventor's Field book:Tools for Transforming Your Government [M]. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2000.
  • 4J. D. Coggbum & S. K. Schneider. The Relationship between State Government Performance and State Quality of Life [J]. International Journal of Public Administration, 2003, 63(12) :206- 213.
  • 5J. F. Helliwell &H. F. Huang. How's Your Government? International Evidence Linking Good Government and Well- Being[J]. British Journal of Political Science, 2008, 38 (1) :595-619.
  • 6M. Tavits. Representation, Corruption and Subjective Well- Being[J]. Comparative Political Studies, 2008, 41 (11) : 1607- 1630.
  • 7S. Kim & D. Kim. Does Government Make People Happy? Exploring New Research Directions for Government' Roles in Happiness[J]. Journal of Happiness Study, 2011, 13 (9) :875-899.
  • 8邢振江,王佳丽.国民幸福指数纳入政府绩效评估探析[J].人口与经济,2011(6):73-77. 被引量:5
  • 9郑方辉.2012中国地方政府绩效评价红皮书[M].北京:新华出版社,2012:185.
  • 10陈刚,李树.政府如何能够让人幸福?——政府质量影响居民幸福感的实证研究[J].管理世界,2012,28(8):55-67. 被引量:261

二级参考文献46

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部