期刊文献+

多项选择题中干扰项信息的利用 被引量:3

Using Information of Distractors in Multiple-Choice Item
下载PDF
导出
摘要 多项选择题是标准测验中最常见的题型之一,它一般包括一个正确项和多个干扰项。大多数研究中都将多项选择题处理成为"答对"、"答错"两种情况,而事实上多项选择题的干扰项中包含大量有意义的信息。本文按照题目的设计,信息的提取,量化分析的顺序,对以往多项选择题中干扰项信息的利用方法进行了回顾。其中量化分析方法又包括,干扰项的统计分析方法、多项选择题的模型化方法和使用干扰信息辅助评估的方法。文章逐一对这些方法做了总结和评价,并探讨了干扰项信息利用方法的未来发展。 Multiple - choice items are wildly used in standardized tests in psychological and educational measurement. There are one correct option and several distractors in a multiple - choice item. However, correct option means right and distractors mean wrong in most cases. In fact, different distractors in the same item contain very different information. Treating all the distractors as zero or non - master is unreasonable. In order to make distractors useful,three steps should be taken. First, develop types of multiple - choice items. Second,quantify these items. At last, choose fit statistics or models. All the methods proposed to make use of distractors in these three steps can be classified into five conditions : a. exploring the distractom by designing various items and options ; b. using data augmentation method to recode the distractom; c. constructing statistics to exploit measurement properties of distractors; d. parameterized the distrac- tors in item response models or cognitive diagnostic models; e. making distractors as external information when other methods are used. We reviewed the methods of using information of distractors in multiple - choice item in this article and discussed the problems in pres- ent existing researches.
出处 《心理学探新》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第3期261-265,共5页 Psychological Exploration
关键词 多项选择题 干扰项 多项选择题模型 干扰项功能差异 multiple - choice item distractor multiple - choice models differential distractor functioning
  • 相关文献

参考文献34

  • 1曹亦薇.初中词汇理解能力量表的编制[J].心理学报,1999,31(2):215-221. 被引量:8
  • 2Abedi, J. , Leon, S. , & Kao, J. C. (2008). Examining differential distractor functioning in reading assessments for students with disabilities. Los Angeles, CA:National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing( CRESST).
  • 3Attali, Y. , & Fraenkel, T. ( 2000 ). Thepoint - biserial as a dis- crimination index for distractors in multiple - choice items: Deficiencies in usage and an iternative. Journal of Education- al Measurement ,37,77 - 86.
  • 4Briggs, D. C., Alonzo, A. C., Schwab, C., & Wilson, M. (2006). Diagnostic assessment with ordered multiple - choice items. Educational Assessment,11,33 - 63.
  • 5dela Torte, J. (2009). A cognitive diagnosis model for cognitive- ly based multiple - choice options. Applied Psychological Measurement ,33,163 - 183.
  • 6Drasgow, F. , Levine, M. V. , & Williams, E. A. ( 1985 ). Appro- priateness measurement with polychotomous item response models and standardized indices. British Journal of Mathemat- ical and Statistical Psychology,38,67 - 86.
  • 7Drasgow, F. , Levine, M. V. , Tsien, S. , Williams, B. , & Mead, A. D. (1995). Fitting polytomous item response theory models to multiple - choice tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 19,143 - 166.
  • 8Green, B. F. , Crone, C. R. , & Folk, V. G. (1989). Amethod for studying differential distractor functioning. Journal of Educa- tional Measurement ,26,147 - 160.
  • 9Griffard,P. B., & Wandersee, J. H. (2001). The two- tier in- strument on photosynthesis : What does it diagnose? Interna- tional Journal of Science Education ,23,1039 - 1052.
  • 10Jacobs,P. I. , & Vandeventer, M. (1970). Information in wrong responses. Psychological Reports,26,311 - 315.

二级参考文献2

  • 1曹亦薇,心理科学,1998年,21卷,4期,375页
  • 2曹亦薇,教育心理学研究(日),1993年,41卷,64页

共引文献7

同被引文献19

引证文献3

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部