期刊文献+

基于贝叶斯理论的ATS测量不确定度评定 被引量:4

Uncertainty Evaluation of Automatic Test System Based on Bayesian Information Fusion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从自动测试系统(ATS)的组成机理出发,提出一种ATS测量不确定度评定方法;其基本过程是首先基于测量信号路径,建立相应的测量链;其次,计算各个传递单元的不确定度,静态测量、动态测量分别选用贝叶斯信息融合法和贝叶斯预测法进行评定;最后,利用蒙特卡罗(MC)法计算各链的合成不确定度;通过某ATS中具体的测量链作为实例,重点分析了动态测量不确定度评定过程中遇到的不同情况及解决办法;实验表明,较其它常用评定方法,该法评定ATS静态测量得到的结果更接近理论值,不确定度变化小,评定动态测量得到结果更符合ATS动态特性且精确度高。 To assess the uncertainty of Automatic Test System (ATS), composing mechanism of a general ATS is discussed in the first. There are three steps should be completed in the case of uncertainty evaluation of ATS.. establishing the measurement chains according to the different signal paths, evaluating the uncertainty of each transfer unit, gaining the final combined uncertainty of each chain. To complete the second step, Bayesian information fusion method and Bayesian dynamic model and forecasting method are employed in the static measurement and dynamic measurement respectively. In the last step, Monte--Carlo (MC) method is accepted to get the final results. Analyzing the solutions of the various problems in the face of dynamic measurement on the basis of a special example, and the experiment result indicates that compared with other common methods, the result got from the ATS static measurement is closer to theoretical value and its variation is less, and the result got from the ATS dynamic measurement is closer to its dynamic characteristics and it is moxe accurate.
出处 《计算机测量与控制》 2015年第6期2053-2055,2060,共4页 Computer Measurement &Control
关键词 自动测试系统 动态测量 贝叶斯理论 蒙特卡罗法 不确定度评定 ATS dynamic measurement Bayesian theory MC method uncertainty evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1国家质量技术监督局计量司.测量不确定度评定与表示指南[M].北京:中国计量出版社,2005.
  • 2族先锋.军用自动测试系统及不确定度评定关键技术研究[D].长沙:国防科技大学,2007:79-81.
  • 3Dimitrios T, Loukia M, Sotirios K, et al. Comparison of ISO- GUM and Monte Carlo methods for the evaluation of measurement uncertainty: Application to direct cadmium measurement in water byGFAAS [J]. Talanta, 2011, 83 (5)= 692-1574.
  • 4凌明祥,李会敏,黎启胜,李明海.含相关性的测量不确定度拟蒙特卡罗评定方法[J].仪器仪表学报,2014,35(6):1385-1393. 被引量:33
  • 5Eichstadt S, Link A, Harris P, et al. Efficient implementation of a Monte Carlo method for uncertainty evaluation in dynamic measure- ments [J]. Metrologia, 2012, 49 (3). 401.
  • 6Elster C, Link A. Uncertainty for dynamic measurements modeled by a linear time invariant-system [J]. Metrologia, 2008, 45 (4): 464-473.
  • 7林洪桦.测量误差与不确定度评估[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2009.
  • 8胡小江,白云,雷虎民.基于虚拟仪器的导弹自动驾驶仪测试系统设计[J].计算机测量与控制,2014,22(10):3237-3238. 被引量:2
  • 9王中宇,葛乐矣,杨文平,李萌.一种小样本虚拟仪器测量不确定度评定新方法[J].计量学报,2008,29(4):387-392. 被引量:14
  • 10Hein K , Pacut A. Generalized model of the quantization error-a unified approach [J]. Instrumentation and Measurement, 1996, 45 (1): 41-44.

二级参考文献42

共引文献138

同被引文献36

引证文献4

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部